Association of visual display terminal time with prevalence of temporomandibular disorder among Japanese workers. Issue 1 (9th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zaitsu, Takashi; Inoue, Yuko; Oshiro, Akiko; Nishiyama, Akira; Kawaguchi, Yoko; Aida, Jun
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational health. Volume 64:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-11-09
• Subjects: temporomandibular disorders (TMD) -- temporomandibular disorders related symptoms (TRS) -- visual display terminal (VDT); Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Medicine, Industrial; Occupational Diseases; Occupational Exposure; Occupational Health; Occupational Medicine; Periodicals; Periodical; Electronic journals; 613.62
• DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12370
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-9145

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Visual display terminal (VDT) time has been reported to affect the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). However, no study has investigated the association between VDT time at and outside of work with TMDs Adjusting for known TMJ risk factors. This study aimed to investigate whether TMDs were associated with VDT time at and outside of work after adjusting for various working conditions in Japanese workers. Methods: This cross‐sectional study was based on an internet survey of 3930 workers (2057 men and 1873 women), The TMD Screening Questionnaire (SQ‐TMD), occupational factors, VDT time at and outside of work, psychosocial factors, and habits were assessed. We applied logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of VDT time on SQ‐TMD with adjustment for confounders. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 43.3 ± 11.7 years, and 778 (19.8%) and 3152 (80.2%) subjects were at high and low TMD‐related symptoms (TRS). Logistic regression analysis adjusting for all covariates (Model 2), the prevalence of high TRS was significantly higher among those with VDT time at work of 60–179 min (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.18–1.94), 180–359 min (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.00–1.62), and more than 360 min (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.10–1.88) compared to those with 0–59 min. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of high TRS for VDT time outside of work. Conclusion: VDT time at work, but not VDT time outside of work, influences the prevalence of TRS. Since the association between VDT time at work and the prevalence of TRS was found even after adjusting for sociopsychological factors and habits generally associated with TMD, further investigation of other factors is needed.