Empirical correlations between an FAS non-ergodic ground motion model and a GIT derived model for Central Italy. Issue 1 (11th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morasca, P; D'Amico, M; Sgobba, S; Lanzano, G; Colavitti, L; Pacor, F; Spallarossa, D
• Is Part Of: Geophysical journal international. Volume 233:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 51
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2022-11-11
• Subjects: Central Italy -- Computational seismology -- Earthquake ground motions -- Generalized Inversion Technique -- Seismic attenuation; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggac445
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-540X

Abstract

SUMMARY: In this study, we investigate the correlation between the residuals of a neGMM (non-ergodic Ground Motion Model) and the physics-based parameters obtained using a non-parametric GIT approach (Generalized Inversion Technique) to lay the groundwork for the implementation of an ad-hoc FAS (Fourier Amplitude Spectra) neGMM for the Central Italy region. This region is particularly suitable for data-driven methodologies as those applied in this work because of the large amount of available data due to the recent multiple main shock–aftershock sequences occurred in this area. Both neGMM and GIT models are developed for Fourier spectra in the frequency range between 0.5 and 25 Hz and using the same reference sites. The comparison of the non-ergodic terms with the source, path and site spectral parameters provides interesting results. First, we find a strong correlation between the source parameters, stress drop Δσ and decay ${k}_{\mathrm{ source}}$ and the source neGMM corrective terms (the combination of the between-event δBe and the location-to-location terms δL2L). This correlation is frequency dependent and, at high frequency, is remarkably positive for Δσ and negative for ${k}_{\mathrm{ source}}$ . Concerning the attenuation terms, the path-to-path residuals (δP2P) are clearly associated with the deviations from the regional Q estimates obtained from GIT analysis. This indicates that the neGMM properly captures the properties of the anelastic attenuation and that the corrective terms δP2P can be used to account for differences in travel paths across different crustal domains. Finally, adopting the same reference sites for neGMM and non-parametric GIT, we observe that the systematic site terms (δS2Ss ) and the GIT-derived amplification functions are in good agreement. The next step for an appropriate modelling is to identify the physical parameters (e.g. VS, 30 and ${k}_0$ ) describing the empirical amplification curves to be introduced as explanatory variables in the ground motion model.