An examination of the usability of the Mayo Test Drive remote cognitive testing platform in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Patel, Jay S; Christianson, Teresa J.; Karstens, Aimee J; Stricker, John L; Kremers, Walter K.; Jack, Clifford R.; Knopman, David S.; Mielke, Michelle M.; Petersen, Ronald C.; Stricker, Nikki H.
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 18(2022)Supplement 7
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.061834
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Mayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for self‐administered assessment for novel (Stricker Learning Span) and open access (Symbols Test) cognitive measures with previously demonstrated validity and reliability. Our study aim was to examine the usability of MTD, defined as the extent to which MTD was used to achieve the desired study goal of completing a testing session among participants willing to engage in an all‐remote study. Methods: 248 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants were invited to participate in this ancillary, uncompensated remote pilot study via email. To examine 1) willingness to participate in a remote cognitive assessment study and 2) usability of MTD, the initiation and completion rates of MTD were examined by cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 142) and cognitively impaired (CI; n = 106) groups (see Figure 1). These rates and other factors associated with MTD feasibility were further explored across age in CU (i.e., 50–69, 70–79, and 80+ years) and specific diagnostic groups in CI (i.e., individuals with dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and possible MCI). Results: Session completion rate (usability) was 98% across all participants who chose to participate, and, surprisingly, completion rates did not vary by age or diagnostic groups ( p = .69; see Table 1). As expected, more individuals chose to participate in the CU (77%) versus CI (52%) group ( p < .001). In terms of feasibility, individuals over 80 and with CI were more likely to have some contact with the study coordinator. Use of smartphones decreased with age, with most CU individuals over 70 using a personal computer (69‐73%; Table 2). Conclusions: Though the CI group was less likely to choose to participate than the CU group, out of those that did choose to participate the rate of completion was 98%. This demonstrates high usability of MTD. Study coordinator support and a flexible testing platform is critical for facilitating participation in remote testing across the aging population, and more supports and incentives may be needed for individuals with cognitive impairment to improve participation rates.