Neuropsychological assessment in the multicultural memory clinic: development and feasibility of the TULIPA battery. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Franzen, Sanne; van den Berg, Esther; Bossenbroek, Willemijn; Kranenburg, Judi; Scheffers, Esther; van Hout, Moniek; van de Wiel, Lotte; Goudsmit, Miriam; van Bruchem‐Visser, Rozemarijn L.; van Hemmen, Judy; Jiskoot, Lize C.; Papma, Janne M.
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 18(2022)Supplement 7
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.063842
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Neuropsychological assessment of culturally diverse populations is hindered by barriers in language, culture, education, and a lack of suitable tests. Furthermore, individuals from diverse backgrounds are often unfamiliar with being cognitively tested. The aim of this study was to develop a new neuropsychological test battery and study its feasibility in multicultural memory clinics. Method: Composition of the TULIPA battery (Towards a Universal Language: Intervention and Psychodiagnostic Assessment) entailed a literature review and consultation with experts and individuals from diverse backgrounds. Feasibility was investigated by examining administration and completion rates and the frequency of factors complicating neuropsychological assessment in 345 patients from 37 countries visiting four multicultural memory clinics in the Netherlands. Result: The test battery included existing tests such as the Cross‐Cultural Dementia screening (CCD), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), and tests from the European Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery, and newly developed tests. Completion rates for the test battery were generally high (82%‐100%), except for CCD Dots subtest B (58%). Although tests of the 'core' TULIPA battery were administered often (median: 6 of 7, IQR: 5–7), supplementary tests were administered less frequently (median: 1 of 9; IQR: 0–3). The number of administered tests correlated with disease severity (RUDAS, ρ = .33, adjusted p<.001), but not with other patient characteristics. Complicating factors were observed frequently, e.g., suboptimal effort (29%‐50%), fatigue (29%), depression (37%‐57%). Conclusion: The TULIPA test battery is a promising new battery to assess culturally diverse populations in a feasible way, provided that complicating factors are taken into account.