Domain‐specific self‐ and informant‐reported cognitive complaints across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cacciamani, Federica; Godefroy, Valérie; Brambati, Simona M; Migliaccio, Raffaella; Montembeault, Maxime
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 18(2022)Supplement 7
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.063895
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: A growing number of studies are currently investigating whether Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) may represent an early indicator of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Due to the high frequency of amnestic AD dementia, SCD research is highly focused on episodic memory. Non‐amnestic complaints are less studied, although patients or their families often report difficulties in retrieving words, planning or spatial orientation, to name a few (e.g., Valech et al., 2018, J Alzheimers Dis). Furthermore, few studies have investigated which source of complaint is the most accurate. In this study, we aimed to measure how accurately self‐ and informant‐reported complaints in different cognitive domains can discriminate individuals along the AD continuum and controls. Method: We selected four groups of participants from the ADNI cohort: amyloid‐positive (Aβ+) individuals with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitively normal (CN), and amyloid‐negative (Aβ‐) CN controls. Self‐ and informant‐reported complaints were measured with the Everyday Cognition questionnaire in four domains, namely, memory, language, visuospatial abilities, and executive functions. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the ECog scores in discriminating the groups. Result: Self‐ and informant‐reported complaints were distributed as follows: memory, language, executive, and visuospatial (from the most severe to the least severe). ECog‐Subject scores globally distinguished groups little better than chance. The Memory score performed best among the ECog‐Subject scores, but the accuracy was low to moderate. In the other three domains, most AUCs were below 0.70 and specificities always below 70%. All ECog‐StudyPartner scores (i.e., in all four cognitive domains) could discriminate MCI and AD from CN, as well as AD from MCI, with good to excellent accuracy (all AUCs between 0.72 and 0.98). However, no ECog‐StudyPartner score seemed useful in distinguishing Aβ+/CN and Aβ‐/CN subjects (all AUC<0.55, all specificity indices <0.22). Conclusion: Self‐reported SCD may have limited utility for both early diagnosis and the inclusion of subjects in research protocols. Individuals with early‐stage AD may already present reduced awareness of their cognitive decline (e.g., Cacciamani et al., 2021, Alzheimer's Res. Ther). For this reason, it seems crucial to consider informant‐reported complaints, both amnestic and non‐amnestic.