A sex skew in life-history research: the problem of missing males. Issue 1979 (27th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Archer, C. Ruth; Paniw, Maria; Vega-Trejo, Regina; Sepil, Irem
• Is Part Of: Proceedings. Volume 289:Issue 1979(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07-27
• Subjects: antagonistic pleiotropy -- demography -- life-history strategies -- sexual selection; Biology -- Periodicals; 570.5
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-8452

Abstract

Abstract : Life-history strategies are diverse. While understanding this diversity is a fundamental aim of evolutionary biology and biodemography, life-history data for some traits—in particular, age-dependent reproductive investment—are biased towards females. While other authors have highlighted this sex skew, the general scale of this bias has not been quantified and its impact on our understanding of evolutionary ecology has not been discussed. This review summarizes why the sexes can evolve different life-history strategies. The scale of the sex skew is then discussed and its magnitude compared between taxonomic groups, laboratory and field studies, and through time. We discuss the consequences of this sex skew for evolutionary and ecological research. In particular, this sex bias means that we cannot test some core evolutionary theory. Additionally, this skew could obscure or drive trends in data and hinder our ability to develop effective conservation strategies. We finally highlight some ways through which this skew could be addressed to help us better understand broad patterns in life-history strategies.