Tau PET imaging with 18F‐PI‐2620 in patients with corticobasal syndrome: a case series. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santibanez, Rodrigo A; Mendez‐Orellana, Carolina; Juri, Carlos; Escobar, Sebastian; Bustamante, Gabriel; Quiroga, Cosme; Contreras, Nicolas; Haeger, Arlette; Amaral, Horacio; Kramer, Vasko
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 18(2022)Supplement 6
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.067105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) is the clinical phenotype originally described for corticobasal degeneration (CBD), a rare sporadic neurodegenerative 4‐repeat tauopathy, clinically characterized by the presence of asymmetric parkinsonism, apraxia, cortical sensory deficits, dystonia, myoclonus, and cognitive dysfunction. However, patients with CBS can have neurodegenerative pathology other than CBD, like progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Vascular Dementia, and Lewy body dementia. Selective tau tracers have made it possible to detect the presence of abnormal tau deposits in vivo. 18 F‐PI‐2620 is a tau‐specific positron emission tomography (PET) tracer with a high binding affinity for aggregated tau. This study aims to investigate the potential role of 18 F‐PI‐2620 as a biomarker in patients with CBS. Method: Four participants with clinical features consistent with probable CBS according to the 2013 Armstrong diagnostic criteria underwent dynamic PET scans for 75 min after injection of 18 F‐PI‐2620. Specific binding ratios were derived from averaged PET images from 45‐75 min post‐injection. Result: First two patients had robust increases in 18 F‐PI‐2620 uptake in temporal, parietal, and occipital cortical regions with relative sparing of globus pallidus and putamen. In the third patient, 18 F‐PI‐2620 uptake was observed in the globus pallidus and putamen with relative sparing of cortical regions. The fourth patient had low 18 F‐PI‐2620 uptake localized in the globus pallidus, temporal, and parietal regions. Conclusion: In the first two patients, 18 F‐PI‐2620 binding distribution resembles what was described for Alzheimer's disease. In the third patient, 18 F‐PI‐2620 uptake pattern suggests PSP. In this particular case, we hypothesize the definitive diagnosis is PSP‐CBS, a rare clinical presentation of PSP with CBS features. Finally, the fourth patient had low 18 F‐PI‐2620 uptake but in areas clearly related to AD, PSP, and probably CBD. Our findings support CBS's heterogeneous pathological basis and suggest that 18 F‐PI‐2620 could represent a valuable tool in the assessment of CBS, establishing an underlying tauopathy in most cases. However, we suspect 18 F‐PI‐2620 in CBS is insufficient to distinguish, in some cases, AD pathology from other tauopathies. Therefore, the use of additional biomarkers to establish the presence of amyloid pathology should be considered. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.