Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study. Issue 12 (26th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Xin; Eriksson, Mikael; Czene, Kamila; Lee, Andrew; Leslie, Goska; Lush, Michael; Wang, Jean; Dennis, Joe; Dorling, Leila; Carvalho, Sara; Mavaddat, Nasim; Simard, Jacques; Schmidt, Marjanka K; Easton, Douglas F; Hall, Per; Antoniou, Antonis C
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical genetics. Volume 59:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 1196
• Page End: 1205
• Publication Date: 2022-09-26
• Subjects: genetic counseling -- public health -- women's health; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108806
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-6244

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The multifactorial Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) breast cancer risk prediction model has been recently extended to consider all established breast cancer risk factors. We assessed the clinical validity of the model in a large independent prospective cohort. Methods: We validated BOADICEA (V.6) in the Swedish KARolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) cohort including 66 415 women of European ancestry (median age 54 years, IQR 45–63; 816 incident breast cancers) without previous cancer diagnosis. We calculated 5-year risks on the basis of questionnaire-based risk factors, pedigree-structured first-degree family history, mammographic density (BI-RADS), a validated breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 313-SNPs, and pathogenic variant status in 8 breast cancer susceptibility genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, RAD51C, RAD51D and BARD1 . Calibration was assessed by comparing observed and expected risks in deciles of predicted risk and the calibration slope. The discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Among the individual model components, the PRS contributed most to breast cancer risk stratification. BOADICEA was well calibrated in predicting the risks for low-risk and high-risk women when all, or subsets of risk factors are included in the risk prediction. Discrimination was maximised when all risk factors are considered (AUC=0.70, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.73; expected-to-observed ratio=0.88, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.04; calibration slope=0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99). The full multifactorial model classified 3.6% women as high risk (5-year risk ≥3%) and 11.1% as very low risk (5-year risk <0.33%). Conclusion: The multifactorial BOADICEA model provides valid breast cancer risk predictions and a basis for personalised decision-making on disease prevention and screening.