Comparison of operational DNA recovery methods: Swabs versus tapelifts. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burmuzoska, Isabella; Hogg, Katherine; Raymond, Jennifer; Hitchcock, Catherine; Meakin, Georgina E.
• Is Part Of: Forensic science international. Volume 8(2022)
• Page Start: 50
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: Trace DNA -- DNA recovery -- Swabs -- Tapelifts; Forensic genetics -- Periodicals; Forensic Genetics -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.019
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1875-1768

Abstract

Abstract: It is routine among many jurisdictions to recover DNA using tapelifts on porous substrates (e.g. clothing) and swabs on non-porous substrates (e.g. tool handles). Here, we examine this by comparing the efficiency of the NSW jurisdiction's specific swabbing and tapelift techniques on a range of porous and non-porous substrates. To test DNA recovery efficiency, 30 μl aliquots of 1:50 and 1:100 saliva dilutions were deposited onto the substrates, left to dry overnight, recovered, extracted, quantified and a subset profiled. Tapelifts recovered more DNA and DNA profiles with more detectable alleles than swabs for both saliva dilutions on porous substrates. For non-porous substrates, similar DNA quantities and profiles were generally recovered with both methods for both saliva dilutions. These data underpin current practices to recover DNA using tapelifts for porous substrates and swabs for non-porous substrates. These data also revealed severe degradation of DNA recovered from brass, supporting the on-going need to improve DNA recovery and analysis methods for brass substrates.