The Dark Energy Survey supernova program: cosmological biases from supernova photometric classification. Issue 1 (3rd June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Dark Energy Survey supernova program: cosmological biases from supernova photometric classification. Issue 1 (3rd June 2022)
- Main Title:
- The Dark Energy Survey supernova program: cosmological biases from supernova photometric classification
- Authors:
- Vincenzi, M
Sullivan, M
Möller, A
Armstrong, P
Bassett, B A
Brout, D
Carollo, D
Carr, A
Davis, T M
Frohmaier, C
Galbany, L
Glazebrook, K
Graur, O
Kelsey, L
Kessler, R
Kovacs, E
Lewis, G F
Lidman, C
Malik, U
Nichol, R C
Popovic, B
Sako, M
Scolnic, D
Smith, M
Taylor, G
Tucker, B E
Wiseman, P
Aguena, M
Allam, S
Annis, J
Asorey, J
Bacon, D
Bertin, E
Brooks, D
Burke, D L
Rosell, A Carnero
Carretero, J
Castander, F J
Costanzi, M
da Costa, L N
Pereira, M E S
De Vicente, J
Desai, S
Diehl, H T
Doel, P
Everett, S
Ferrero, I
Flaugher, B
Fosalba, P
Frieman, J
García-Bellido, J
Gerdes, D W
Gruen, D
Gutierrez, G
Hinton, S R
Hollowood, D L
Honscheid, K
James, D J
Kuehn, K
Kuropatkin, N
Lahav, O
Li, T S
Lima, M
Maia, M A G
Marshall, J L
Miquel, R
Morgan, R
Ogando, R L C
Palmese, A
Paz-Chinchón, F
Pieres, A
Malagón, A A Plazas
Reil, K
Roodman, A
Sanchez, E
Schubnell, M
Serrano, S
Sevilla-Noarbe, I
Suchyta, E
Tarle, G
To, C
Varga, T N
Weller, J
Wilkinson, R D
… (more) - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Cosmological analyses of samples of photometrically identified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) depend on understanding the effects of 'contamination' from core-collapse and peculiar SN Ia events. We employ a rigorous analysis using the photometric classifier SuperNNova on state-of-the-art simulations of SN samples to determine cosmological biases due to such 'non-Ia' contamination in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) 5-yr SN sample. Depending on the non-Ia SN models used in the SuperNNova training and testing samples, contamination ranges from 0.8 to 3.5 per cent, with a classification efficiency of 97.7–99.5 per cent. Using the Bayesian Estimation Applied to Multiple Species (BEAMS) framework and its extension BBC ('BEAMS with Bias Correction'), we produce a redshift-binned Hubble diagram marginalized over contamination and corrected for selection effects, and use it to constrain the dark energy equation-of-state, w . Assuming a flat universe with Gaussian ΩM prior of 0.311 ± 0.010, we show that biases on w are <0.008 when using SuperNNova, with systematic uncertainties associated with contamination around 10 per cent of the statistical uncertainty on w for the DES-SN sample. An alternative approach of discarding contaminants using outlier rejection techniques (e.g. Chauvenet's criterion) in place of SuperNNova leads to biases on w that are larger but still modest (0.015–0.03). Finally, we measure biases due to contamination on w 0 and wa (assuming a flat universe), andABSTRACT: Cosmological analyses of samples of photometrically identified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) depend on understanding the effects of 'contamination' from core-collapse and peculiar SN Ia events. We employ a rigorous analysis using the photometric classifier SuperNNova on state-of-the-art simulations of SN samples to determine cosmological biases due to such 'non-Ia' contamination in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) 5-yr SN sample. Depending on the non-Ia SN models used in the SuperNNova training and testing samples, contamination ranges from 0.8 to 3.5 per cent, with a classification efficiency of 97.7–99.5 per cent. Using the Bayesian Estimation Applied to Multiple Species (BEAMS) framework and its extension BBC ('BEAMS with Bias Correction'), we produce a redshift-binned Hubble diagram marginalized over contamination and corrected for selection effects, and use it to constrain the dark energy equation-of-state, w . Assuming a flat universe with Gaussian ΩM prior of 0.311 ± 0.010, we show that biases on w are <0.008 when using SuperNNova, with systematic uncertainties associated with contamination around 10 per cent of the statistical uncertainty on w for the DES-SN sample. An alternative approach of discarding contaminants using outlier rejection techniques (e.g. Chauvenet's criterion) in place of SuperNNova leads to biases on w that are larger but still modest (0.015–0.03). Finally, we measure biases due to contamination on w 0 and wa (assuming a flat universe), and find these to be <0.009 in w 0 and <0.108 in wa, 5 to 10 times smaller than the statistical uncertainties for the DES-SN sample. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 518:Issue 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Issue:
- Volume 518:Issue 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 518, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 518
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0518-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1106
- Page End:
- 1127
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-03
- Subjects:
- surveys -- supernovae: general -- cosmology: observations
Astronomy -- Periodicals
Periodicals
520.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2966 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/issuelist.asp?journal=mnr ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/mnr ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/mnras/stac1404 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0035-8711
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5943.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24772.xml