Absolute agreement and consistency of the OptoGait system and Freemed platform for measuring walking gait. (December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Absolute agreement and consistency of the OptoGait system and Freemed platform for measuring walking gait. (December 2022)
- Main Title:
- Absolute agreement and consistency of the OptoGait system and Freemed platform for measuring walking gait
- Authors:
- Núñez-Trull, Alejandro
Alvarez-Medina, Javier
Jaén-Carrillo, Diego
Roche-Seruendo, Luis E.
Gómez-Trullén, Eva - Abstract:
- Highlights: Optogait system and Freemed platform are valid portable systems for gait analysis. Optogait exhibits higher accuracy for functional foot rockers identification. The interchangeable use of these portable systems should be avoided. Functional foot rockers analysis may aid in assessing and monitoring walking gait. Abstract: The gait cycle can be divided into four functional rocker units. Although the widespread use of the OptoGait (OG) system and the Freemed (FM) platform, their accuracy has not been tested. An observational study was completed with eighteen healthy volunteers to determine the accuracy of OG and FM for overground walking gait analysis. The pairwise comparison between data obtained from OG, FM and high-speed video analysis revealed significant differences for most of the measurements ( p < 0.05). ICCs revealed an excellent absolute agreement between measurements (ICCs > 0.94) for all measures for OG systems compared to video-analysis. When considering FM vs. video-analysis, ICCs showed good absolute agreement for rocker 1 (ICC = 0.86) and 3 (ICC = 0.82), excellent for rocker 2 (ICC = 0.93) and poor (ICC < 0.5) for rocker 4. Bland-Altman plots (95% limits of agreement) revealed heteroscedasticity of error for OG in all variables for foot rockers (r 2 > 0.1) while no heteroscedasticity of error was found when using FM (r 2 < 0.1). This study indicates that the OG system and the FM platform can provide consistent foot rockers values when walking at aHighlights: Optogait system and Freemed platform are valid portable systems for gait analysis. Optogait exhibits higher accuracy for functional foot rockers identification. The interchangeable use of these portable systems should be avoided. Functional foot rockers analysis may aid in assessing and monitoring walking gait. Abstract: The gait cycle can be divided into four functional rocker units. Although the widespread use of the OptoGait (OG) system and the Freemed (FM) platform, their accuracy has not been tested. An observational study was completed with eighteen healthy volunteers to determine the accuracy of OG and FM for overground walking gait analysis. The pairwise comparison between data obtained from OG, FM and high-speed video analysis revealed significant differences for most of the measurements ( p < 0.05). ICCs revealed an excellent absolute agreement between measurements (ICCs > 0.94) for all measures for OG systems compared to video-analysis. When considering FM vs. video-analysis, ICCs showed good absolute agreement for rocker 1 (ICC = 0.86) and 3 (ICC = 0.82), excellent for rocker 2 (ICC = 0.93) and poor (ICC < 0.5) for rocker 4. Bland-Altman plots (95% limits of agreement) revealed heteroscedasticity of error for OG in all variables for foot rockers (r 2 > 0.1) while no heteroscedasticity of error was found when using FM (r 2 < 0.1). This study indicates that the OG system and the FM platform can provide consistent foot rockers values when walking at a constant velocity. The differences between the systems assessed and their agreement and consistency values advise against their interchangeable use. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical engineering & physics. Volume 110(2022)
- Journal:
- Medical engineering & physics
- Issue:
- Volume 110(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 110, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 110
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0110-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12
- Subjects:
- Heel-off -- Pressure platform -- Rockers -- Testing
Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals
Biomedical Engineering -- Periodicals
Physics -- Periodicals
Génie biomédical -- Périodiques
Biomedical engineering
Electronic journals
Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.medengphys.com ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13504533 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/13504533 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/13504533 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103912 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1350-4533
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5527.323000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24793.xml