Demographics, management and outcome of females and males with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study. Issue 4 (17th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Demographics, management and outcome of females and males with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study. Issue 4 (17th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Demographics, management and outcome of females and males with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study
- Authors:
- McNicholas, Bairbre A.
Madotto, Fabiana
Pham, Tài
Rezoagli, Emanuele
Masterson, Claire H.
Horie, Shahd
Bellani, Giacomo
Brochard, Laurent
Laffey, John G. - Abstract:
- Rationale: We wished to determine the influence of sex on the management and outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients in the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE). Methods: We assessed the effect of sex on mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with ARDS who underwent IMV, adjusting for plausible clinical and geographic confounders. Findings: Of 2377 patients with ARDS, 905 (38%) were female and 1472 (62%) were male. There were no sex differences in clinician recognition of ARDS or critical illness severity profile. Females received higher tidal volumes (8.2±2.1 versus 7.2±1.6 mL·kg −1 ; p<0.0001) and higher plateau and driving pressures compared with males. Lower tidal volume ventilation was received by 50% of females compared with 74% of males (p<0.0001). In shorter patients (height ≤1.69 m), females were significantly less likely to receive lower tidal volumes. Surviving females had a shorter duration of IMV and reduced length of stay compared with males. Overall hospital mortality was similar in females (40.2%) versus males (40.2%). However, female sex was associated with higher mortality in patients with severe confirmed ARDS (OR for sex (male versus female) 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.83). Conclusions: Shorter females with ARDS are less likely to receive lower tidal volume ventilation, while femalesRationale: We wished to determine the influence of sex on the management and outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients in the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE). Methods: We assessed the effect of sex on mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with ARDS who underwent IMV, adjusting for plausible clinical and geographic confounders. Findings: Of 2377 patients with ARDS, 905 (38%) were female and 1472 (62%) were male. There were no sex differences in clinician recognition of ARDS or critical illness severity profile. Females received higher tidal volumes (8.2±2.1 versus 7.2±1.6 mL·kg −1 ; p<0.0001) and higher plateau and driving pressures compared with males. Lower tidal volume ventilation was received by 50% of females compared with 74% of males (p<0.0001). In shorter patients (height ≤1.69 m), females were significantly less likely to receive lower tidal volumes. Surviving females had a shorter duration of IMV and reduced length of stay compared with males. Overall hospital mortality was similar in females (40.2%) versus males (40.2%). However, female sex was associated with higher mortality in patients with severe confirmed ARDS (OR for sex (male versus female) 0.35, 95% CI 0.14–0.83). Conclusions: Shorter females with ARDS are less likely to receive lower tidal volume ventilation, while females with severe confirmed ARDS have a higher mortality risk. These data highlight the need for better ventilatory management in females to improve their outcomes from ARDS. Shorter females with ARDS were less likely to receive lower tidal volume ventilation than shorter males, while mortality rates were higher in females with confirmed severe ARDS. Better ventilatory management may improve outcomes in females with ARDS. http://bit.ly/2JIsUBz … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 54:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 54:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 54, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 54
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0054-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-17
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.00609-2019 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24776.xml