'An expensive commodity'? The impact of hope on US foreign policy during the 'unipolar moment'. (March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hehir, Aidan
• Is Part Of: European journal of international relations. Volume 29:Number 1(2023)
• Page Start: 202
• Page End: 226
• Publication Date: 2023-03
• Subjects: Hope -- unipolarity -- United States -- imperial overstretch -- liberalism -- US exceptionalism; International relations -- Periodicals; 327.05
• DOI: 10.1177/13540661221143941
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-0661

Abstract

'Imperial overstretch' and the role played by related ideational issues derived from particular liberal tenets and the United States' belief in its 'manifest destiny' to lead the world have been regularly cited as explanations for why the United States' ambitious project to transform the world in the post–Cold War era failed. In this article, I argue that these analyses have overlooked a crucial causal factor that also impelled the United States to undertake its ultimately doomed project: hope. I demonstrate that analyses of hope's influence have found that while hope can exert a positive influence, it can also – if irrational – induce self-destructive behaviour. During the period of unipolarity, the United States repeatedly advanced teleological visions of a bright future for humanity routinely infused with the language of hope. I demonstrate that hope was, however, more than just a discursive device; it was itself a catalyst for the United States' actions. I argue that a confluence of factors at the end of the Cold War aligned to impel the rapid emergence of a particular variant of hope – defined as 'wilful hope' – which inspired the United States to act as it did. I demonstrate how this disposition was evident in the rhetoric employed by both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush but also – more importantly – in the strategies they each implemented. Ultimately, this disposition played a crucial – though not exclusive – role in undermining international support for US leadership and precipitating the end of 'the unipolar moment'.