Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised controlled trial. Issue 6 (24th June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised controlled trial. Issue 6 (24th June 2021)
- Main Title:
- Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised controlled trial
- Authors:
- Walker, Steven P.
Keenan, Emma
Bintcliffe, Oliver
Stanton, Andrew E.
Roberts, Mark
Pepperell, Justin
Fairbairn, Ian
McKeown, Edward
Goldring, James
Maddekar, Nadeem
Walters, James
West, Alex
Bhatta, Amrithraj
Knight, Matthew
Mercer, Rachel
Hallifax, Rob
White, Paul
Miller, Robert F.
Rahman, Najib M.
Maskell, Nick A. - Abstract:
- Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is traditionally managed with an intercostal chest tube attached to an underwater seal. We investigated whether use of a one-way flutter valve shortened patients' length of stay (LoS). This open-label randomised controlled trial enrolled patients presenting with SSP and randomised to either a chest tube and underwater seal (standard care: SC) or ambulatory care (AC) with a flutter valve. The type of flutter valve used depended on whether at randomisation the patient already had a chest tube in place: in those without a chest tube a pleural vent (PV) was used; in those with a chest tube in situ, an Atrium Pneumostat (AP) valve was attached. The primary end-point was LoS. Between March 2017 and March 2020, 41 patients underwent randomisation: 20 to SC and 21 to AC (13=PV, 8=AP). There was no difference in LoS in the first 30 days following treatment intervention: AC (median=6 days, IQR 14.5) and SC (median=6 days, IQR 13.3). In patients treated with PV there was a high rate of early treatment failure (6/13; 46%), compared to patients receiving SC (3/20; 15%) (p=0.11) Patients treated with AP had no (0/8 0%) early treatment failures and a median LoS of 1.5 days (IQR 23.8). There was no difference in LoS between ambulatory and standard care. Pleural Vents had high rates of treatment failure and should not be used in SSP. Atrium Pneumostats are a safer alternative, with a trend towards lower LoS. Ambulatory management with a flutter valveSecondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) is traditionally managed with an intercostal chest tube attached to an underwater seal. We investigated whether use of a one-way flutter valve shortened patients' length of stay (LoS). This open-label randomised controlled trial enrolled patients presenting with SSP and randomised to either a chest tube and underwater seal (standard care: SC) or ambulatory care (AC) with a flutter valve. The type of flutter valve used depended on whether at randomisation the patient already had a chest tube in place: in those without a chest tube a pleural vent (PV) was used; in those with a chest tube in situ, an Atrium Pneumostat (AP) valve was attached. The primary end-point was LoS. Between March 2017 and March 2020, 41 patients underwent randomisation: 20 to SC and 21 to AC (13=PV, 8=AP). There was no difference in LoS in the first 30 days following treatment intervention: AC (median=6 days, IQR 14.5) and SC (median=6 days, IQR 13.3). In patients treated with PV there was a high rate of early treatment failure (6/13; 46%), compared to patients receiving SC (3/20; 15%) (p=0.11) Patients treated with AP had no (0/8 0%) early treatment failures and a median LoS of 1.5 days (IQR 23.8). There was no difference in LoS between ambulatory and standard care. Pleural Vents had high rates of treatment failure and should not be used in SSP. Atrium Pneumostats are a safer alternative, with a trend towards lower LoS. Ambulatory management with a flutter valve does not shorten overall length of stay in patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces compared to standard management. This was due to increased risk of treatment failure with ambulatory management. https://bit.ly/2JEd3YC … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 57:Issue 6(2021)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 57:Issue 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 57, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 57
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0057-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06-24
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.03375-2020 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24801.xml