How universal is preference for visual curvature? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Issue 1 (26th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chuquichambi, Erick G.; Vartanian, Oshin; Skov, Martin; Corradi, Guido B.; Nadal, Marcos; Silvia, Paul J.; Munar, Enric
• Is Part Of: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Volume 1518:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 151
• Page End: 165
• Publication Date: 2022-10-26
• Subjects: contour -- hedonic liking -- preference -- vision -- visual curvature; Medical sciences -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14919
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0077-8923

Abstract

Abstract: Evidence dating back a century shows that humans are sensitive to and exhibit a preference for visual curvature. This effect has been observed in different age groups, human cultures, and primate species, suggesting that a preference for curvature could be universal. At the same time, several studies have found that preference for curvature is modulated by contextual and individual factors, casting doubt on this hypothesis. To resolve these conflicting findings, we conducted a systematic meta‐analysis of studies that have investigated the preference for visual curvature. Our meta‐analysis included 61 studies which provided 106 independent samples and 309 effect sizes. The results of a three‐level random effects model revealed a Hedges' g of 0.39—consistent with a medium effect size. Further analyses revealed that preference for curvature is moderated by four factors: presentation time, stimulus type, expertise, and task. Together, our results suggest that preference for visual curvature is a reliable but not universal phenomenon and is influenced by factors other than perceptual information. Abstract : Evidence shows that humans exhibit a preference for visual curvature and suggests that this preference could be universal. However, several studies have found that preference for curvature is modulated by contextual and individual factors. We conducted a systematic meta‐analysis to resolve these conflicting findings. Our model revealed a medium effect size for a preference for visual curvature, but it was moderated by presentation time, stimulus type, expertise, and task.