Effect of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: two randomised controlled trials of the CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative Group. Issue 2 (11th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: two randomised controlled trials of the CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative Group. Issue 2 (11th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Effect of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: two randomised controlled trials of the CORIMUNO-19 Collaborative Group
- Authors:
- Hermine, Olivier
Mariette, Xavier
Porcher, Raphael
Resche-Rigon, Matthieu
Tharaux, Pierre-Louis
Ravaud, Philippe - Abstract:
- Background: Our objective was to determine whether anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptors improve outcomes of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. We report on two cohort-embedded, investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, Bayesian randomised controlled clinical trials. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (UC) or UC+tocilizumab (TCZ) 8 mg·kg −1 (TOCI-2 trial) or UC or UC+sarilumab (SARI) 200 mg (SARI-2 trial), both intravenously on day 1 and, if clinically indicated, on day 3. Results: Between 31 March and 20 April 2020, 97 patients were randomised in the TOCI-2 trial, to receive UC (n=46) or UC+TCZ (n=51). At day 14, numbers of patients who did not need noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV) and were alive with TCZ or UC were similar (47% versus 42%; median posterior hazard ratio (HR) 1.19, 90% credible interval (CrI) 0.71–2.04), with a posterior probability of HR >1 of 71.4%. Between 27 March and 4 April 2020, 91 patients were randomised in the SARI-2 trial, to receive UC (n=41) or UC+SARI (n=50). At day 14, numbers of patients who did not need NIV or MV and were alive with SARI or UC were similar (38% versus 33%; median posterior HR 1.05, 90% CrI 0.55–2.07), with a posterior probability of HR >1 of 54.9%. Overall, the risk of death up to day 90 was: UC+TCZ 24% versus UC 30% (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.30–1.49) and UC+SARI 29% versus UC 39% (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35–1.58). Both TCZ and SARIBackground: Our objective was to determine whether anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptors improve outcomes of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. We report on two cohort-embedded, investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, Bayesian randomised controlled clinical trials. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (UC) or UC+tocilizumab (TCZ) 8 mg·kg −1 (TOCI-2 trial) or UC or UC+sarilumab (SARI) 200 mg (SARI-2 trial), both intravenously on day 1 and, if clinically indicated, on day 3. Results: Between 31 March and 20 April 2020, 97 patients were randomised in the TOCI-2 trial, to receive UC (n=46) or UC+TCZ (n=51). At day 14, numbers of patients who did not need noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or mechanical ventilation (MV) and were alive with TCZ or UC were similar (47% versus 42%; median posterior hazard ratio (HR) 1.19, 90% credible interval (CrI) 0.71–2.04), with a posterior probability of HR >1 of 71.4%. Between 27 March and 4 April 2020, 91 patients were randomised in the SARI-2 trial, to receive UC (n=41) or UC+SARI (n=50). At day 14, numbers of patients who did not need NIV or MV and were alive with SARI or UC were similar (38% versus 33%; median posterior HR 1.05, 90% CrI 0.55–2.07), with a posterior probability of HR >1 of 54.9%. Overall, the risk of death up to day 90 was: UC+TCZ 24% versus UC 30% (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.30–1.49) and UC+SARI 29% versus UC 39% (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35–1.58). Both TCZ and SARI increased serious infectious events. Conclusion: In critically ill patients with COVID-19, anti-IL-6 receptors did not significantly increase the number of patients alive without any NIV or MV by day 14. In two prospective randomised studies of COVID-19 patients in the ICU, anti-IL-6 receptor did not significantly increase early survival without mechanical ventilation. However, due to the small number of patients, no definitive conclusion could be drawn. https://bit.ly/3GoFAJV … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 60:Issue 2(2022)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 60:Issue 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 60, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 60
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0060-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-11
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.02523-2021 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24755.xml