Benefits of specialist severe asthma management: demographic and geographic disparities. Issue 6 (15th December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Benefits of specialist severe asthma management: demographic and geographic disparities. Issue 6 (15th December 2022)
- Main Title:
- Benefits of specialist severe asthma management: demographic and geographic disparities
- Authors:
- Redmond, Charlene
Heaney, Liam G.
Chaudhuri, Rekha
Jackson, David J.
Menzies-Gow, Andrew
Pfeffer, Paul
Busby, John - Abstract:
- Background: The benefits of specialist assessment and management have yet to be evaluated within the biologic era of UK severe asthma treatment, and potential disparities have not been considered. Methods: In an uncontrolled before-and-after study, we compared asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6)), exacerbations, unscheduled secondary care use, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )) and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose after 1 year. We compared outcomes by sex, age (18–34, 35–49, 50–64 and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Caucasian versus non-Caucasian) and hospital site after adjusting for demographics and variation in biologic therapy use. Results: 1140 patients were followed-up for 1370 person-years from 12 specialist centres. At annual review, ACQ-6 score was reduced by a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 0.7 (0.0–1.5), exacerbations by 75% (33–100%) and unscheduled secondary care by 100% (67–100%). FEV1 increased by a median (IQR) of 20 (−200–340) mL, while OCS dose decreased for 67% of patients. Clinically meaningful improvements occurred across almost all patients, including those not receiving biologic therapy. There was little evidence of differences across demographic groups, although those aged ≥65 years demonstrated larger reductions in exacerbations (69% versus 52%; p<0.001) and unscheduled care use (77% versus 50%; p<0.001) compared with patients aged 18–34 years. There were >2-fold differences between the best and worst performingBackground: The benefits of specialist assessment and management have yet to be evaluated within the biologic era of UK severe asthma treatment, and potential disparities have not been considered. Methods: In an uncontrolled before-and-after study, we compared asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6)), exacerbations, unscheduled secondary care use, lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )) and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose after 1 year. We compared outcomes by sex, age (18–34, 35–49, 50–64 and ≥65 years), ethnicity (Caucasian versus non-Caucasian) and hospital site after adjusting for demographics and variation in biologic therapy use. Results: 1140 patients were followed-up for 1370 person-years from 12 specialist centres. At annual review, ACQ-6 score was reduced by a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 0.7 (0.0–1.5), exacerbations by 75% (33–100%) and unscheduled secondary care by 100% (67–100%). FEV1 increased by a median (IQR) of 20 (−200–340) mL, while OCS dose decreased for 67% of patients. Clinically meaningful improvements occurred across almost all patients, including those not receiving biologic therapy. There was little evidence of differences across demographic groups, although those aged ≥65 years demonstrated larger reductions in exacerbations (69% versus 52%; p<0.001) and unscheduled care use (77% versus 50%; p<0.001) compared with patients aged 18–34 years. There were >2-fold differences between the best and worst performing centres across all study outcomes. Conclusions: Specialist assessment and management is associated with substantially improved patient outcomes, which are broadly consistent across demographic groups and are not restricted to those receiving biologic therapy. Significant variation exists between hospitals, which requires further investigation. Specialist assessment and management of patients with severe asthma leads to substantially improved patient outcomes, which are broadly consistent across demographic groups although vary substantially across hospitals https://bit.ly/3ORDfei … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 60:Issue 6(2022)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 60:Issue 6(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 60, Issue 6 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 60
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0060-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12-15
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.00660-2022 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24750.xml