Impact of do‐it‐yourself air cleaner design on the reduction of simulated wildfire smoke in a controlled chamber environment. (25th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holder, Amara L.; Halliday, Hannah S.; Virtaranta, Larry
• Is Part Of: Indoor air. Volume 32:Number 11(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-11-25
• Subjects: air filtration -- air purifier -- filter fan -- fine particulate matter -- indoor air quality -- wildfire smoke; Indoor air pollution -- Periodicals; Sick building syndrome -- Periodicals; Ventilation -- Periodicals; 613.5
• DOI: 10.1111/ina.13163
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-6947

Abstract

Abstract: During wildfire smoke events public health agencies release advisories to stay indoors, close doors and windows, and operate a portable air cleaner (PAC). The do‐it‐yourself (DIY) air cleaner consisting of a box fan and a furnace filter is a widely used low‐cost alternative to commercial PACs because of its increased accessibility. In this study, we evaluate the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of different DIY air cleaner designs for reducing simulated wildfire smoke and identify operating parameters that may impact their performance and use. The simplest formulation of a DIY air cleaner (box fan with taped on minimum effectiveness reporting value – [MERV] 13 furnace filter) had a CADR of 111.2 ± 1.3 ft 3 /min (CFM). Increasing the fan flow by changing the fan type, increasing the fan setting, or reducing the pressure drop across the filtering surface increased the CADR. Large increases in CADR could be obtained by using a shroud (40%), using a 4″ thick filter (123%) using two filters in a wedge shape (137%), or using four filters in a Corsi‐Rosenthal (CR) box design (261%). The CADR was greatly reduced with filters heavily loaded with smoke, pointing to the need for frequent filter changes during smoke events.