The Number of Positive Tumor Markers (NPTM) Achieves Higher Value in the Prognosis Prediction of Gastric Cancer. (28th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Number of Positive Tumor Markers (NPTM) Achieves Higher Value in the Prognosis Prediction of Gastric Cancer. (28th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- The Number of Positive Tumor Markers (NPTM) Achieves Higher Value in the Prognosis Prediction of Gastric Cancer
- Authors:
- Li, Limin
Ma, Bing
Liu, Fubin
Sheng, Chao
Peng, Yu
Qiao, Yating
Wang, Peng
Chen, Kexin
Song, Fangfang - Other Names:
- González Alvaro Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose. The clinical application of combined tumor markers is still limited. We aim to explore the value of the combination of multiple tumor markers in gastric cancer (GC) prognosis. Methods. The prognostic significance was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The estimated area under the curve (AUC) was compared to evaluate the discriminatory ability of different indicators. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of multivariable cox regression, and its performance was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index and calibration curve. Results. NPTM (number of positive tumor markers) displayed independent prognostic significance whether in the whole cohort or in patients with different stages. Patients with the all-negative tumor markers had a worse prognosis after postoperative chemotherapy in all cohort (P = 0.023 ) or in age ≤60 subgroup (P = 0.012 ), while patients with positive tumor markers had a better prognosis after postoperative chemotherapy in stage III (P = 0.012 ). The AUC value of NPTM is higher than any individual tumor marker. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of the CTNM (combination of NPTM and pTNM) increased by 5%, 4.8%, and 3.6%, respectively, compared with TNM staging system. The nomogram constructed including NPTM showed its high accuracy (C − index = 0.706 ) versus TNM staging system (C − index = 0.646 ) and CTNM (C − index = 0.681 ). Conclusions. NPTM was an independentAbstract : Purpose. The clinical application of combined tumor markers is still limited. We aim to explore the value of the combination of multiple tumor markers in gastric cancer (GC) prognosis. Methods. The prognostic significance was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The estimated area under the curve (AUC) was compared to evaluate the discriminatory ability of different indicators. A nomogram was constructed based on the results of multivariable cox regression, and its performance was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index and calibration curve. Results. NPTM (number of positive tumor markers) displayed independent prognostic significance whether in the whole cohort or in patients with different stages. Patients with the all-negative tumor markers had a worse prognosis after postoperative chemotherapy in all cohort (P = 0.023 ) or in age ≤60 subgroup (P = 0.012 ), while patients with positive tumor markers had a better prognosis after postoperative chemotherapy in stage III (P = 0.012 ). The AUC value of NPTM is higher than any individual tumor marker. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values of the CTNM (combination of NPTM and pTNM) increased by 5%, 4.8%, and 3.6%, respectively, compared with TNM staging system. The nomogram constructed including NPTM showed its high accuracy (C − index = 0.706 ) versus TNM staging system (C − index = 0.646 ) and CTNM (C − index = 0.681 ). Conclusions. NPTM was an independent predictor of gastric cancer prognosis, showing more accurate prognostic performance than individual tumor markers. Especially its significance in guiding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and predicting prognosis by combination with TNM staging system may have a better clinical application value. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Disease markers. Volume 2022(2022)
- Journal:
- Disease markers
- Issue:
- Volume 2022(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2022, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 2022
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-2022-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-28
- Subjects:
- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Biochemical markers -- Periodicals
Pathology -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/dm/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1155/2022/5145918 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0278-0240
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 24734.xml