Prevalence and characteristics of advocacy curricula in Australian public health degrees. (19th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhatti, Alexandra J.; Lin, Sophia; Post, Dannielle; Baldock, Katherine; Dawes, Nathan
• Other Names: Blackford Krysten guestEditor.; Taylor Jane guestEditor.; Devine Sue guestEditor.; Woodall James guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Health promotion journal of Australia. Volume 33(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 50
• Page End: 56
• Publication Date: 2022-07-19
• Subjects: advocacy -- health promotion -- postgraduate education in public health -- public health education -- public health workforce -- undergraduate education in public health; Health promotion -- Periodicals; Health promotion -- Australia -- Periodicals; 613.0994
• DOI: 10.1002/hpja.634
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1036-1073

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Public health advocacy is a fundamental part of health promotion practice. Advocacy efforts can lead to healthier public policies and positive impacts on society. Public health educators are responsible for equipping graduates with cross‐cutting advocacy competencies to address current and future public health challenges. Problem: Knowledge of the extent to which students are taught public health advocacy is limited. To determine whether advocacy teaching within public health degrees matches industry needs, knowledge of pedagogical approaches to advocacy curricula is required. This study sought to understand the extent to which advocacy is taught and assessed within Australian public health degrees. Methodology: Australian public health Bachelor's and Master's degrees were identified using the CRICOS database. Open‐source online unit guides were reviewed to determine where and how advocacy was included within core and elective units (in title, unit description or learning outcomes). Degree directors and convenors of identified units were surveyed to further garner information about advocacy in the curriculum. Results: Of 65 identified degrees, 17 of 26 (65%) undergraduate degrees and 24 of 39 (62%) postgraduate degrees included advocacy within the core curriculum, while 6 of 26 (23%) undergraduate and 8 of 39 (21%) postgraduate offered no advocacy curriculum. Implications: Australian and international public health competency frameworks indicate advocacy curriculum should be included in all degrees. This research suggests advocacy competencies are not ubiquitous within Australian public health curricula. The findings support the need to advance public health advocacy teaching efforts further.