Effect of esophageal cooling on ablation lesion formation in the left atrium: Insights from Ablation Index data in the IMPACT trial and clinical outcomes. (2nd November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leung, Lisa W. M.; Akhtar, Zaki; Elbatran, Ahmed I.; Bajpai, Abhay; Li, Anthony; Norman, Mark; Kaba, Riyaz; Sohal, Manav; Zuberi, Zia; Gallagher, Mark M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 33:Number 12(2022)
• Page Start: 2546
• Page End: 2557
• Publication Date: 2022-11-02
• Subjects: Ablation Index -- AF ablation -- efficacy -- efficiency -- esophageal cooling; Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.15717
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-3873

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The IMPACT study established the role of controlled esophageal cooling in preventing esophageal thermal injury during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The effect of esophageal cooling on ablation lesion delivery and procedural and patient outcomes had not been previously studied. The objective was to determine the effect of esophageal cooling on the formation of RF lesions, the ability to achieve procedural endpoints, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Participants in the IMPACT trial underwent AF ablation guided by Ablation Index (30 W at 350–400 AI posteriorly, 40 W at ≥450 AI anteriorly). A blinded 1:1 randomization assigned patients to the use of the ensoETM® device to keep esophageal temperature at 4°C during ablation or standard practice using a single‐sensor temperature probe. Ablation parameters and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Procedural data from 188 patients were analyzed. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar, and all pulmonary veins were isolated. First‐pass pulmonary vein isolation and reconnection at the end of the waiting period were similar in both randomized groups (51/64 vs. 51/68; p = 0.54 and 5/64 vs. 7/68; p = 0.76, respectively). Posterior wall isolation was also similar: 24/33 versus 27/38; p = 0.88. Ablation effect on tissue, measured in impedance drop, was no different between the two randomized groups: 8.6Ω (IQR: 6–11.8) versus 8.76Ω (IQR: 6–12.2; p = 0.25). Arrhythmia recurrence was similar after 12 months (21.1% vs. 24.1%; 95% CI: 0.38–1.84; HR: 0.83; p = 0.66). Conclusions: Esophageal cooling has been shown to be effective in reducing ablation‐related thermal injury during RF ablation. This protection does not compromise standard procedural endpoints or clinical success at 12 months.