Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time. (15th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morris, Tim T; Heron, Jon; Sanderson, Eleanor C M; Davey Smith, George; Didelez, Vanessa; Tilling, Kate
• Is Part Of: International journal of epidemiology. Volume 51:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: 1899
• Page End: 1909
• Publication Date: 2022-07-15
• Subjects: Mendelian randomization -- causal inference -- longitudinal -- simulation; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5771

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful tool through which the causal effects of modifiable exposures on outcomes can be estimated from observational data. Most exposures vary throughout the life course, but MR is commonly applied to one measurement of an exposure (e.g. weight measured once between ages 40 and 60 years). It has been argued that MR provides biased causal effect estimates when applied to one measure of an exposure that varies over time. Methods: We propose an approach that emphasizes the liability that causes the entire exposure trajectory. We demonstrate this approach using simulations and an applied example. Results: We show that rather than estimating the direct or total causal effect of changing the exposure value at a given time, MR estimates the causal effect of changing the underlying liability for the exposure, scaled to the effect of the liability on the exposure at that time. As such, results from MR conducted at different time points are expected to differ (unless the effect of the liability on exposure is constant over time), as we illustrate by estimating the effect of body mass index measured at different ages on systolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Univariable MR results should not be interpreted as time-point-specific direct or total causal effects, but as the effect of changing the liability for the exposure. Estimates of how the effects of a genetic variant on an exposure vary over time, together with biological knowledge that provides evidence regarding likely effective exposure periods, are required to interpret time-point-specific causal effects.