Blood Pressure Responses During Exercise: Physiological Correlates and Clinical Implications. Issue 1 (17th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nayor, Matthew; Gajjar, Priya; Murthy, Venkatesh L.; Miller, Patricia E.; Velagaleti, Raghava S.; Larson, Martin G.; Vasan, Ramachandran S.; Lewis, Gregory D.; Mitchell, Gary F.; Shah, Ravi V.
• Is Part Of: Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. Volume 43:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 163
• Page End: 173
• Publication Date: 2022-11-17
• Subjects: blood pressure -- cardiovascular disease -- exercise test -- vascular stiffness -- workload; Arteriosclerosis -- Periodicals; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; Blood-vessels -- Pathophysiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.13
• DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318512
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1079-5642

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Abnormal blood pressure (BP) responses to exercise can predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but their optimal measurement and definitions are poorly understood. We combined frequently sampled BP during cardiopulmonary exercise testing with vascular stiffness assessment to parse cardiac and vascular components of exercise BP. Methods: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing with BP measured every two minutes and resting vascular tonometry were performed in 2858 Framingham Heart Study participants. Linear regression was used to analyze sex-specific exercise BP patterns as a function of arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) and cardiac-peripheral performance (defined by peak O2 pulse). Results: Our sample was balanced by sex (52% women) with mean age 54±9 years and 47% with hypertension. We observed variability in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and peak O2 pulse across individuals with clinically defined exercise hypertension (peak systolic BP [SBP] in men ≥210 mm Hg; in women ≥190 mm Hg). Despite similar resting SBP and cardiometabolic profiles, individuals with higher peak O2 pulse displayed higher peak SBP ( P ≤0.017) alongside higher fitness levels ( P <0.001), suggesting that high peak exercise SBP in the context of high peak O2 pulse may in fact be favorable. Although both higher (favorable) O2 pulse and higher (adverse) arterial stiffness were associated with greater peak SBP ( P <0.0001 for both), the magnitude of association of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity with peak SBP was higher in women (sex–carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity interaction P <0.0001). In sex-specific models, exercise SBP measures accounting for workload (eg, SBP during unloaded exercise, SBP at 75 watts, and SBP/workload slope) were directly associated with the adverse features of greater arterial stiffness and lower peak O2 pulse. Conclusions: Higher peak exercise SBP reflects a complex trade-off between arterial stiffness and cardiac-peripheral performance that differs by sex. Studies of BP responses to exercise accounting for vascular and cardiac physiology may illuminate mechanisms of hypertension and clarify clinical interpretation of exercise BP.