Evaluation of GNSS-based Volunteered Geographic Information for assessing visitor spatial distribution within protected areas: A case study of the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. (January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Horst, Laura; Taczanowska, Karolina; Porst, Florian; Arnberger, Arne
• Is Part Of: Applied geography. Volume 150(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-01
• Subjects: GNSS -- GPS -- VGI -- Social media -- Protected area -- Recreation -- Tourism -- Visitor monitoring -- Bavarian Forest National Park -- Hiking -- Recreational trails -- GPS tracking -- Big data -- GPSies -- Outdooractive -- Komoot -- Nature protection -- Visitor management -- Spatial behaviour; GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System -- VGI Volunteered Geographic Information; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Human ecology -- Periodicals; 910
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102825
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-6228

Abstract

Abstract: Systematic monitoring of recreational use in vulnerable ecosystems is crucial to balance human needs and site capacities. Recently, publicly available digital data, including Global Navigation Satellite System-based Volunteered Geographic Information, gained attention as a potential resource depicting visitor movement. However, there is a need to critically assess its reliability for visitor monitoring across countries, regions and available databases. Our research evaluates the usability of GNSS-based VGI-data obtained from three common platforms: GPSies, Outdooractive, and Komoot for assessing the spatial distribution of hikers in the Bavarian Forest National Park. A total sample of 1742 GNSS-tracks uploaded between 2013 and 2018 were compared across data platforms. Additionally, available systematic field counts, carried out between 2013 and 2014 (11 Eco-Counter sensors), were compared to GNSS-based VGI data uploaded within the corresponding period. The comparisons at individual and collective levels (route lengths, kernel density, optimized hotspot analysis along with fishnet-based counts of GNSS-tracks) showed similarities between VGI data platforms. Data obtained from GPSies and Outdooractive displayed a higher correlation with each other than with those obtained from Komoot. Also, for GPSies, there was a significant positive correlation between VGI-data and field count data. Data sample of Outdooractive and Komoot within the specified spatio-temporal frame was too small to compare with available field count data. We highlight the necessity of systematic validation of GNSS-based VGI data resources, being complementary rather than the primary data source in visitor monitoring and recreation planning. Also, systematic long-term visitor monitoring using other methods is crucial to assess the validity of novel data resources, such as GNSS-based VGI. Highlights: This study evaluates usability of GNSS-based VGI-data for monitoring human spatial behaviour in outdoor recreational areas. We compared data obtained from three platforms(GPSies, Outdooractive, Komoot) and field counts available for Bavarian Forest NP There was a significant positive correlation in GNSS-tracks distribution across all investigated VGI platforms. There was a significant positive correlation between VGI-data and field counts in case of GPSies. We highlight the necessity of systematic validation of GNSS-based VGI data resources in recreation monitoring.