Clinical implementation and validation of an automated adaptive workflow for proton therapy. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taasti, Vicki Trier; Hazelaar, Colien; Vaassen, Femke; Vaniqui, Ana; Verhoeven, Karolien; Hoebers, Frank; van Elmpt, Wouter; Canters, Richard; Unipan, Mirko
• Is Part Of: Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. Volume 24(2022)
• Page Start: 59
• Page End: 64
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Proton therapy -- Deformable image registration -- Repeat-CT evaluation -- Scripting -- Automation -- Efficiency gain; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiation dosimetry -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Oncology -- Periodicals; 615.842
• DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2405-6316

Abstract

Abstract: Background and purpose: Treatment quality of proton therapy can be monitored by repeat-computed tomography scans (reCTs). However, manual re-delineation of target contours can be time-consuming. To improve the workflow, we implemented an automated reCT evaluation, and assessed if automatic target contour propagation would lead to the same clinical decision for plan adaptation as the manual workflow. Materials and methods: This study included 79 consecutive patients with a total of 250 reCTs which had been manually evaluated. To assess the feasibility of automated reCT evaluation, we propagated the clinical target volumes (CTVs) deformably from the planning-CT to the reCTs in a commercial treatment planning system. The dose-volume-histogram parameters were extracted for manually re-delineated (CTVmanual ) and deformably mapped target contours (CTVauto ). It was compared if CTVmanual and CTVauto both satisfied/failed the clinical constraints. Duration of the reCT workflows was also recorded. Results: In 92% (N = 229) of the reCTs correct flagging was obtained. Only 4% (N = 9) of the reCTs presented with false negatives (i.e., at least one clinical constraint failed for CTVmanual, but all constraints were satisfied for CTVauto ), while 5% (N = 12) of the reCTs led to a false positive. Only for one false negative reCT a plan adaption was made in clinical practice, i.e., only one adaptation would have been missed, suggesting that automated reCT evaluation was possible. Clinical introduction hereof led to a time reduction of 49 h (from 65 to 16 h). Conclusion: Deformable target contour propagation was clinically acceptable. A script-based automatic reCT evaluation workflow has been introduced in routine clinical practice.