Added value of multiple autoantibody testing for predicting progression to inflammatory arthritis in at-risk individuals. Issue 2 (19th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ponchel, Frederique; Duquenne, Laurence; Xie, Xuanxiao; Corscadden, Diane; Shuweihdi, Farag; Mankia, K; Trouw, L A; Emery, Paul
• Is Part Of: RMD open. Volume 8:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-19
• Subjects: Arthritis, Rheumatoid -- Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies -- Rheumatoid Factor; Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002512
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2056-5933

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Predicting progression to clinical arthritis in individuals at-risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis is a prerequisite to developing stratification groups for prevention strategies. Selecting accurate predictive criteria is the critical step to define the population at-risk. While positivity for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) remains the main recruitment biomarker, positivity for other autoantibodies (AutoAbs) identified before the onset of symptoms, may provide additional predictive accuracy for stratification. Objective: To perform a multiple AutoAbs analysis for both the prediction and the time of progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: 392 individuals were recruited based on a new musculoskeletal complaint and positivity for ACPA or rheumatoid factor (RF). ELISAs were performed for ACPA, RF, anti-nuclear Ab, anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-collagen AutoAbs. Logistic and COX regression were used for analysis. Results: Progression to IA was observed in 125/392 (32%) of cases, of which 78 progressed within 12 months. The AutoAbs ACPA, RF, anti-CarP were individually associated with progression (p<0.0001) and improved prediction when combined with demographic/clinical data (Accuracy >77%; area under the curve (AUC) >0.789), compared with prediction using only demographic/clinical data (72.9%, AUC=0.760). Multiple AutoAbs testing provided added value, with +6.4% accuracy for number of positive AutoAbs (AUC=0.852); +5.4% accuracy for AutoAbs levels (ACPA/anti-CarP, AUC=0.832); and +6.2% accuracy for risk-groups based on high/low levels (ACPA/RF/anti-CarP, AUC=0.837). Time to imminent progression was best predicted using ACPA/anti-CarP levels (AUC=0.779), while the number of positive AutoAbs was/status/risk were as good (AUC=0.778). Conclusion: We confirm added value of multiple AutoAbs testing for identifying progressors to clinical disease, allowing more specific stratification for intervention studies.