Modeling the power of acoustic monitoring to predict bat fatalities at wind turbines. Issue 12 (10th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Modeling the power of acoustic monitoring to predict bat fatalities at wind turbines. Issue 12 (10th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Modeling the power of acoustic monitoring to predict bat fatalities at wind turbines
- Authors:
- Voigt, Christian C.
Scherer, Cedric
Runkel, Volker - Abstract:
- Abstract: Large numbers of bats are killed at wind turbines worldwide. To formulate mitigation measures such as curtailment, recent approaches relate the acoustic activity of bats around reference turbines to casualties to extrapolate fatality rates at turbines where only acoustic surveys are conducted. Here, we modeled how sensitive this approach is when spatial distributions of bats vary within the rotor‐swept zone, and when the coverage of acoustic monitoring deteriorates, for example, with increasing turbine size. The predictive power of acoustic surveys was high for uniform or random distributions of bats. A concentration of bat passes around the nacelle or at the lower portion of the risk zone caused an overestimation of bat activity when ultrasonic microphones were pointed downwards at the nacelle. Conversely, a concentration of bat passes at the edge or at the top portion of the risk zone caused an underestimation of bat activity. These effects increased as the coverage of the acoustic monitoring decreased. Extrapolated fatality rates may not necessarily match with real conditions without knowledge of the spatial distribution of bats, particularly when the risk zone is poorly covered by acoustic monitoring, when spatial distributions are skewed and when turbines are large or frequencies of echolocating bats high. We argue that the predictive power of acoustic surveys is sufficiently strong for nonrandom or nonuniform distributions when validated by carcass searchesAbstract: Large numbers of bats are killed at wind turbines worldwide. To formulate mitigation measures such as curtailment, recent approaches relate the acoustic activity of bats around reference turbines to casualties to extrapolate fatality rates at turbines where only acoustic surveys are conducted. Here, we modeled how sensitive this approach is when spatial distributions of bats vary within the rotor‐swept zone, and when the coverage of acoustic monitoring deteriorates, for example, with increasing turbine size. The predictive power of acoustic surveys was high for uniform or random distributions of bats. A concentration of bat passes around the nacelle or at the lower portion of the risk zone caused an overestimation of bat activity when ultrasonic microphones were pointed downwards at the nacelle. Conversely, a concentration of bat passes at the edge or at the top portion of the risk zone caused an underestimation of bat activity. These effects increased as the coverage of the acoustic monitoring decreased. Extrapolated fatality rates may not necessarily match with real conditions without knowledge of the spatial distribution of bats, particularly when the risk zone is poorly covered by acoustic monitoring, when spatial distributions are skewed and when turbines are large or frequencies of echolocating bats high. We argue that the predictive power of acoustic surveys is sufficiently strong for nonrandom or nonuniform distributions when validated by carcass searches and by complementary studies on the spatial distribution of bats at turbines. Abstract : To formulate mitigation schemes for reducing fatality rates at wind turbines, consultants monitor bats in the risk zone with ultrasonic detectors. We simulated how sensitive this approach is when ignoring information on the spatial distribution of bats, particularly for varying turbine sizes and functional gilds of bats. We recommend ground‐truthing acoustic data with carcass searches and study the spatial distribution of bats in the risk in more detail to avoid inefficient curtailment procedures at wind turbines. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Conservation science and practice. Volume 4:Issue 12(2022)
- Journal:
- Conservation science and practice
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 12(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 12 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0004-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-10
- Subjects:
- curtailment -- green–green dilemma -- mitigation -- wind energy production -- wind farm
Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals
Biodiversity conservation
Periodicals
333.951605 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25784854 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/csp2.12841 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2578-4854
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24701.xml