Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome. Issue 3 (30th August 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome. Issue 3 (30th August 2017)
- Main Title:
- Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome
- Authors:
- Grønseth, Rune
Drengenes, Christine
Wiker, Harald G.
Tangedal, Solveig
Xue, Yaxin
Husebø, Gunnar Reksten
Svanes, Øistein
Lehmann, Sverre
Aardal, Marit
Hoang, Tuyen
Kalananthan, Tharmini
Hjellestad Martinsen, Einar Marius
Orvedal Leiten, Elise
Aanerud, Marianne
Nordeide, Eli
Haaland, Ingvild
Jonassen, Inge
Bakke, Per
Eagan, Tomas - Abstract:
- The aim was to evaluate susceptibility of oropharyngeal contamination with various bronchoscopic sampling techniques. 67 patients with obstructive lung disease and 58 control subjects underwent bronchoscopy with small-volume lavage (SVL) through the working channel, protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) and bilateral protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Subjects also provided an oral wash (OW) sample, and negative control samples were gathered for each bronchoscopy procedure. DNA encoding bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced and bioinformatically processed to cluster into operational taxonomic units (OTU), assign taxonomy and obtain measures of diversity. The proportion of Proteobacteria increased, whereas Firmicutes diminished in the order OW, SVL, PBAL, PSB (p<0.01). The alpha-diversity decreased in the same order (p<0.01). Also, beta-diversity varied by sampling method (p<0.01), and visualisation of principal coordinates analyses indicated that differences in diversity were smaller between OW and SVL and OW and PBAL samples than for OW and the PSB samples. The order of sampling (left versus right first) did not influence alpha- or beta-diversity for PSB samples. Studies of the airway microbiota need to address the potential for oropharyngeal contamination, and protected sampling might represent an acceptable measure to minimise this problem. Protected bronchoscopic sampling is most suitable for identification of a distinct airway microbiomeThe aim was to evaluate susceptibility of oropharyngeal contamination with various bronchoscopic sampling techniques. 67 patients with obstructive lung disease and 58 control subjects underwent bronchoscopy with small-volume lavage (SVL) through the working channel, protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) and bilateral protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Subjects also provided an oral wash (OW) sample, and negative control samples were gathered for each bronchoscopy procedure. DNA encoding bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced and bioinformatically processed to cluster into operational taxonomic units (OTU), assign taxonomy and obtain measures of diversity. The proportion of Proteobacteria increased, whereas Firmicutes diminished in the order OW, SVL, PBAL, PSB (p<0.01). The alpha-diversity decreased in the same order (p<0.01). Also, beta-diversity varied by sampling method (p<0.01), and visualisation of principal coordinates analyses indicated that differences in diversity were smaller between OW and SVL and OW and PBAL samples than for OW and the PSB samples. The order of sampling (left versus right first) did not influence alpha- or beta-diversity for PSB samples. Studies of the airway microbiota need to address the potential for oropharyngeal contamination, and protected sampling might represent an acceptable measure to minimise this problem. Protected bronchoscopic sampling is most suitable for identification of a distinct airway microbiome http://ow.ly/qIIy30eqB9M … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ERJ open research. Volume 3:Issue 3(2017)
- Journal:
- ERJ open research
- Issue:
- Volume 3:Issue 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0003-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-08-30
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
Respiration
Respiratory organs -- Diseases
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Treatment
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Electronic journals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Periodical
616.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://openres.ersjournals.com/ ↗
http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/76947 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/23120541.00019-2017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2312-0541
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 24692.xml