Assessment of polymicrobial interactions in bacterial isolates from transfused platelet units associated with sepsis. Issue 12 (30th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kerantzas, Christopher A.; Merwede, Jacob; Snyder, Edward L.; Hendrickson, Jeanne E.; Tormey, Christopher A.; Kazmierczak, Barbara I.; Peaper, David R.
• Is Part Of: Transfusion. Volume 62:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 2458
• Page End: 2463
• Publication Date: 2022-09-30
• Subjects: Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals; Blood Group Antigens -- Periodicals; Blood Preservation -- Periodicals; Blood Transfusion -- Periodicals; 615
• DOI: 10.1111/trf.17136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0041-1132

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In 2019 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a series of 4 transfusion reactions that resulted from contamination of apheresis platelet products. Products involved in all 4 cases were contaminated with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus‐baumannii complex (ACBC) and in 3 products Staphylococcus saprophyticus was found as well. CDC investigation found that bacterial isolates from the cases were genetically related and suggested a common source of contamination. The contamination of blood products with ACBC is rare and polymicrobial contamination of blood products even less common. ACBC and S. saprophyticus have been observed to adhere to one another and sediment out of suspension in vitro, a process referred to as coaggregation, and we hypothesized that there was an interaction between the strains from these cases that contributed to their co‐contamination of blood products. Study design and methods: To test the hypothesis of bacterial interaction, we performed coaggregation experiments and observed the growth characteristics of ACBC and S. saprophyticus strains recovered from contaminated blood products involved in a subset of the CDC cases. Results: An increase in S. saprophyticus CFU concentration was observed after several days of co‐culture with ACBC in LB and plasma; however, no other findings suggested coaggregation or augmentative growth interaction between the bacterial strains. Conclusion: Ultimately, an interaction between ACBC and S. saprophyticus that could help explain their co‐occurrence and growth in contaminated platelet units was not found; however future studies of potential interactions may be warranted.