Long‐read sequence analysis for clustered genomic copy number aberrations revealed architectures of intricately intertwined rearrangements. Issue 1 (25th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tamura, Takeaki; Yamamoto Shimojima, Keiko; Okamoto, Nobuhiko; Yagasaki, Hiroshi; Morioka, Ichiro; Kanno, Hitoshi; Minakuchi, Yohei; Toyoda, Atsushi; Yamamoto, Toshiyuki
• Is Part Of: American journal of medical genetics. Volume 191:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 112
• Page End: 119
• Publication Date: 2022-10-25
• Subjects: alternative nonhomologous end‐joining (NHEJ) -- chromoanasynthesis -- chromothripsis -- complex chromosomal rearrangement -- long‐read sequence -- polymerase theta; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; 616.14205
• DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62997
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-4825

Abstract

Abstract: Most chromosomal aberrations revealed by chromosomal microarray testing (CMA) are simple; however, very complex chromosomal structural rearrangements can also be found. Although the mechanism of structural rearrangements has been gradually revealed, not all mechanisms have been elucidated. We analyzed the breakpoint‐junctions (BJs) of two or more clustered copy number variations (CNVs) in the same chromosome arms to understand their conformation and the mechanism of complex structural rearrangements. Combining CMA with long‐read whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) analysis, we successfully determined all BJs for the clustered CNVs identified in four patients. Multiple CNVs were intricately intertwined with each other, and clustered CNVs in four patients were involved in global complex chromosomal rearrangements. The BJs of two clustered deletions identified in two patients showed microhomologies, and their characteristics were explained by chromothripsis. In contrast, the BJs in the other two patients, who showed clustered deletions and duplications, consisted of blunt‐end and nontemplated insertions. These findings could be explained only by alternative nonhomologous end‐joining, a mechanism related to polymerase theta. All the patients had at least one inverted segment. Three patients showed cryptic aberrations involving a disruption and a deletion/duplication, which were not detected by CMA but were first identified by WGS. This result suggested that complex rearrangements should be considered if clustered CNVs are observed in the same chromosome arms. Because CMA has potential limitations in genotype–phenotype correlation analysis, a more detailed analysis by whole genome examination is recommended in cases of suspected complex structural aberrations.