Implementing microwell slides for detection and isolation of single circulating tumor cells from complex cell suspensions. Issue 12 (14th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Liwen; Rivandi, Mahdi; Franken, André; Hieltjes, Maarten; van der Zaag, Pieter Jan; Nelep, Constantin; Eberhardt, Jens; Peter, Stefan; Niederacher, Dieter; Fehm, Tanja; Neubauer, Hans
• Is Part Of: Cytometry. Volume 101:Issue 12(2022)
• Page Start: 1057
• Page End: 1067
• Publication Date: 2022-06-14
• Subjects: CellCelector -- circulating tumor cell -- microwells -- single cell -- transcriptomic analysis.; Flow cytometry -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in biology -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 571.605
• DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24660
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-4922

Abstract

Abstract: Cell loss during detection and isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is a challenge especially when label‐free pre‐enrichment technologies are used without the aid of magnetic particles. Although microfluidic systems can remove the majority of "contaminating" white blood cells (WBCs), their remaining numbers are still impeding single CTC isolation, thus making additional separation steps needed. This study aimed to develop a workflow from blood‐to‐single CTC for complex cell suspensions by testing two microwell formats. In the first step, different cell lines were used to compare the performances of Sievewell™ 370 K (TOK, Japan) and CellCelector™ Nanowell U25 (ALS Automated Lab Solutions, Germany) slides for cell labelling and single‐cell micromanipulation. Confounding levels of auto‐fluorescence inherent to different plastic materials used to cast the microwells, staining recovery rates, and cell isolation rates were determined. In the second step, three different blood preservation tubes were tested for RNA analysis. Lastly, the established workflow was applied to isolate CTCs from peripheral blood samples obtained from metastasized breast cancer (mBC) patients for single‐cell DNA and RNA analysis. The detection of CTCs in Sievewell slides profit from better signal‐to‐noise ratios in the fluorescence channels mainly used for CTC detection. In addition, due to its design, Sievewell supports direct in situ CTC labelling, which minimizes cell loss and leads to single‐cell recovery rates after staining of approx. 94%. Detection of PIK3CA mutations in single CTCs verified the applicability of the workflow for the analysis of genomic DNA of CTCs. Furthermore, combined with blood preservation up to 48 h at room temperature in LBguard tubes, panel RT‐PCR transcript analysis was successful for single cell line cells and CTCs, respectively. The combined use of Sievewell microwell slides and CellCelector™ automated micromanipulation system improves single CTC detection, labelling and isolation from complex cell suspensions. This approach is especially valuable when samples of high cellular content are processed.