The Effect Of A Sensory Activity Schedule (SAS) On The On-Task Behaviors Of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Issue 4 (2nd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benson, Jeryl D.; Blaskowitz, Meghan G.; Collins, Aleyna; Smitsky, Deborah; Chippich, Erica; Connell, Claire
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational therapy, schools, & early intervention. Volume 15:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 439
• Page End: 454
• Publication Date: 2022-10-02
• Subjects: Sensory activities -- ASD -- occupational therapy -- schools; Occupational therapy for children -- United States -- Periodicals; Occupational therapy for children -- Periodicals; Children with disabilities -- Education -- United States -- Periodicals; Children with disabilities -- Education -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 615.85150830973
• DOI: 10.1080/19411243.2021.2003734
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-1243

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Occupational Therapists often use interventions that support sensory processing. Interventions may include Ayres sensory integration, sensory based intervetnions or use of sensory input built into the childs routine. This quasi-experimental study explored the effects of a sensory activity schedule (SAS) on the on-task behaviors of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) during independent work time. Using a single subject, A-B-A-B design with a non-SAS phase (A) and SAS phase (B), the type and frequency of prompts for completion of work tasks were recorded and analyzed from a convenience sample of 7 participants with ASD in a special education classroom. The results are mixed. Visual analysis of participant data demonstrated that all participants displayed level changes and an overall decrease in the mean number of cues they required to remain on-task, although there was a high variability within phases. These results suggest that child-specific sensory activities may have a positive effect on on-task behaviors during some tasks while having no effect at other times. The use of a SAS resulted in a decrease in teacher cues required for on-task behavior for some participants but had minimal or no impact for other participants. Additional research is needed.