OGC O06 An international cohort study of prognosis associated with pathologically complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy of surgical treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. (7th December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- OGC O06 An international cohort study of prognosis associated with pathologically complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy of surgical treated esophageal adenocarcinoma. (7th December 2022)
- Main Title:
- OGC O06 An international cohort study of prognosis associated with pathologically complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy of surgical treated esophageal adenocarcinoma
- Authors:
- Markar, Sheraz
Cools-Lartigue, Jonathan
Mueller, Carmen
Hofstetter, Wayne
Nilsson, Magnus
Ilonen, Ilka
Soderstrom, Henna
Rasanen, Jari
Gisbertz, Suzanne
Hanna, George
Elliott, Jessie
Reynolds, John
Kisiel, Aaron
Griffiths, Ewen
van Berge Henegouwen, Mark
Ferri, Lorenzo - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Objective: To compare overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with a complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Background: In the absence of survival differences in several prior studies comparing nCT with nCRT, the higher rate of pCR after nCRT has been suggested as reason to prefer this modality over nCT. Methods: An international cohort study included data from 8 high-volume centers. Inclusion criteria was patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, between 2008 and 2018, who had a pCR following nCT or nCRT. Univariate analysis was used to compare demographic factors, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis used to compare 5-year OS and RFS between groups. Results: 465 patients with pCR following neoadjuvant treatment were included; 132 received nCT and 333 received nCRT. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year OS between groups (78.8% (nCT) vs. 65.5% (nCRT), p=0.099), with a similar result demonstrated in multivariate analysis (HR=1.19, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.84). 5-year RFS was significantly reduced in patients with a pCR following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (75.3% (nCRT) vs. 87.1% (nCT), p=0.026). Multivariate analysis confirmed nCRT was associated with a poorer 5-year RFS (HR=1.70, 95%CI 1.22 to 2.99). nCRT associated with a significantly greater prevalence of 5-year distant recurrence (Odds ratio = 2.50, 95%CIAbstract: Background: Objective: To compare overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with a complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Background: In the absence of survival differences in several prior studies comparing nCT with nCRT, the higher rate of pCR after nCRT has been suggested as reason to prefer this modality over nCT. Methods: An international cohort study included data from 8 high-volume centers. Inclusion criteria was patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, between 2008 and 2018, who had a pCR following nCT or nCRT. Univariate analysis was used to compare demographic factors, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis used to compare 5-year OS and RFS between groups. Results: 465 patients with pCR following neoadjuvant treatment were included; 132 received nCT and 333 received nCRT. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year OS between groups (78.8% (nCT) vs. 65.5% (nCRT), p=0.099), with a similar result demonstrated in multivariate analysis (HR=1.19, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.84). 5-year RFS was significantly reduced in patients with a pCR following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (75.3% (nCRT) vs. 87.1% (nCT), p=0.026). Multivariate analysis confirmed nCRT was associated with a poorer 5-year RFS (HR=1.70, 95%CI 1.22 to 2.99). nCRT associated with a significantly greater prevalence of 5-year distant recurrence (Odds ratio = 2.50, 95%CI 1.25–4.99). Conclusions: The results of this international cohort study show that the prognosis of pCR following different neoadjuvant regimes differs, bringing into question the validity of this measure as an oncological surrogate when comparing neoadjuvant treatment schemes for esophageal adenocarcinoma. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 9
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2022)Supplement 9
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 9 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0109-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12-07
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znac404.038 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24679.xml