175 Evaluation of the 5-step test in supporting transition out of booster seats. (20th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 175 Evaluation of the 5-step test in supporting transition out of booster seats. (20th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- 175 Evaluation of the 5-step test in supporting transition out of booster seats
- Authors:
- Powell, Stacie
Dai, Wennie
Ho, Catherine
Bestman, Amy
White, Tom
Bilston, Lynne
Brown, Julie - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and Aims: Moving a child from booster seat to adult lap and sash belt too soon is common in Australia and worldwide. This can increase the severity of injury in the event of trauma in a motor vehicle crash. While there is an existing tool (the 5-step test) to support parents in making the transition decision, to our knowledge, this tool has never been studied for effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify strengths and weaknesses of the 5-step test. Methods: A randomised controlled design was used to determine differences in the decision-making processes that parents engage when transitioning out of a booster using the existing 5-step test (intervention group) compared to the legal requirements (control group). Using a purpose-built rig, belt fit conditions were adjusted based on child's anthropomorphic measurements. Parents of children aged 7–12 years were then asked to 'think out loud' as they assessed the appropriateness of an adult seatbelt when observing their child in three different seatbelt fit conditions (good, poor, and partially good fit). Results and Conclusion: Preliminary results show parents using the 5-step test made more accurate decisions about the appropriateness of their child using the adult seatbelt compared to control group, but there are clear opportunities to improve and refine the tool to better support parents making this transition decision. Future studies should include input from parents and carers whist mappingAbstract : Background and Aims: Moving a child from booster seat to adult lap and sash belt too soon is common in Australia and worldwide. This can increase the severity of injury in the event of trauma in a motor vehicle crash. While there is an existing tool (the 5-step test) to support parents in making the transition decision, to our knowledge, this tool has never been studied for effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify strengths and weaknesses of the 5-step test. Methods: A randomised controlled design was used to determine differences in the decision-making processes that parents engage when transitioning out of a booster using the existing 5-step test (intervention group) compared to the legal requirements (control group). Using a purpose-built rig, belt fit conditions were adjusted based on child's anthropomorphic measurements. Parents of children aged 7–12 years were then asked to 'think out loud' as they assessed the appropriateness of an adult seatbelt when observing their child in three different seatbelt fit conditions (good, poor, and partially good fit). Results and Conclusion: Preliminary results show parents using the 5-step test made more accurate decisions about the appropriateness of their child using the adult seatbelt compared to control group, but there are clear opportunities to improve and refine the tool to better support parents making this transition decision. Future studies should include input from parents and carers whist mapping behaviour markers using Behaviour Change Techniques when creating improved resources to support parents making transition decisions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Injury prevention. Volume 28(2022)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Injury prevention
- Issue:
- Volume 28(2022)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0028-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A27
- Page End:
- A27
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-20
- Subjects:
- Children's accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Accidents -- Prevention -- Periodicals
617.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://ip.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.injuryprevention.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/injuryprev-2022-safety2022.80 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1353-8047
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24665.xml