The role of vitamin D in the age of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Issue 11 (6th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The role of vitamin D in the age of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Issue 11 (6th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- The role of vitamin D in the age of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
- Authors:
- Ghasemian, Roya
Shamshirian, Amir
Heydari, Keyvan
Malekan, Mohammad
Alizadeh‐Navaei, Reza
Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad Ali
Ebrahimi Warkiani, Majid
Jafarpour, Hamed
Razavi Bazaz, Sajad
Rezaei Shahmirzadi, Arash
Khodabandeh, Mehrdad
Seyfari, Benyamin
Motamedzadeh, Alireza
Dadgostar, Ehsan
Aalinezhad, Marzieh
Sedaghat, Meghdad
Razzaghi, Nazanin
Zarandi, Bahman
Asadi, Anahita
Yaghoubi Naei, Vahid
Beheshti, Reza
Hessami, Amirhossein
Azizi, Soheil
Mohseni, Ali Reza
Shamshirian, Danial - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID‐19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta‐analysis in order to maximise the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID‐19. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science up to December 18, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID‐19 patients were entered into the systematic review. Results: Twenty‐three studies containing 11 901 participants entered into the meta‐analysis. The meta‐analysis indicated that 41% of COVID‐19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 29%‐55%), and in 42% of patients, levels of vitamin D were insufficient (95% CI, 24%‐63%). The serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 20.3 ng/mL among all COVID‐19 patients (95% CI, 12.1‐19.8). The odds of getting infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are 3.3 times higher among individuals with vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 2.5‐4.3). The chance of developing severe COVID‐19 is about five times higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency (OR: 5.1, 95% CI, 2.6‐10.3). There is no significant association between vitamin D status and higher mortality rates (OR: 1.6, 95% CI, 0.5‐4.4). Conclusion: This study found that most of the COVID‐19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. Also, there is about three times higherAbstract: Background: Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be a crucial supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID‐19. Hence, we carried out a systematic review and meta‐analysis in order to maximise the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID‐19. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science up to December 18, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID‐19 patients were entered into the systematic review. Results: Twenty‐three studies containing 11 901 participants entered into the meta‐analysis. The meta‐analysis indicated that 41% of COVID‐19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 29%‐55%), and in 42% of patients, levels of vitamin D were insufficient (95% CI, 24%‐63%). The serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 20.3 ng/mL among all COVID‐19 patients (95% CI, 12.1‐19.8). The odds of getting infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are 3.3 times higher among individuals with vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 2.5‐4.3). The chance of developing severe COVID‐19 is about five times higher in patients with vitamin D deficiency (OR: 5.1, 95% CI, 2.6‐10.3). There is no significant association between vitamin D status and higher mortality rates (OR: 1.6, 95% CI, 0.5‐4.4). Conclusion: This study found that most of the COVID‐19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. Also, there is about three times higher chance of getting infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 among vitamin‐D‐deficient individuals and about five times higher probability of developing the severe disease in vitamin‐D‐deficient patients. Vitamin D deficiency showed no significant association with mortality rates in this population. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of clinical practice. Volume 75:Issue 11(2021)
- Journal:
- International journal of clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Issue 11(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 11 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0075-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-06
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ijcp ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1742-1241 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1368-5031&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1742-1241 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ijcp.14675 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-5031
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.172160
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24641.xml