Combined simultaneous multislice bSSFP and compressed sensing for first‐pass myocardial perfusion at 1.5 T with high spatial resolution and coverage. Issue 6 (12th June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Combined simultaneous multislice bSSFP and compressed sensing for first‐pass myocardial perfusion at 1.5 T with high spatial resolution and coverage. Issue 6 (12th June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Combined simultaneous multislice bSSFP and compressed sensing for first‐pass myocardial perfusion at 1.5 T with high spatial resolution and coverage
- Authors:
- McElroy, Sarah
Ferrazzi, Giulio
Nazir, Muhummad Sohaib
Kunze, Karl P.
Neji, Radhouene
Speier, Peter
Stäb, Daniel
Forman, Christoph
Razavi, Reza
Chiribiri, Amedeo
Roujol, Sébastien - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To implement and evaluate a pseudorandom undersampling scheme for combined simultaneous multislice (SMS) balanced SSFP (bSSFP) and compressed‐sensing (CS) reconstruction to enable myocardial perfusion imaging with high spatial resolution and coverage at 1.5 T. Methods: A prospective pseudorandom undersampling scheme that is compatible with SMS‐bSSFP phase‐cycling requirements and CS was developed. The SMS‐bSSFP CS with pseudorandom and linear undersampling schemes were compared in a phantom. A high‐resolution (1.4 × 1.4 mm 2 ) six‐slice SMS‐bSSFP CS perfusion sequence was compared with a conventional (1.9 × 1.9 mm 2 ) three‐slice sequence in 10 patients. Qualitative assessment of image quality, perceived SNR, and number of diagnostic segments and quantitative measurements of sharpness, upslope index, and contrast ratio were performed. Results: In phantom experiments, pseudorandom undersampling resulted in residual artifact (RMS error) reduction by a factor of 7 compared with linear undersampling. In vivo, the proposed sequence demonstrated higher perceived SNR (2.9 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, P = .04), improved sharpness (0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.32 ± 0.05, P = .01), and a higher number of diagnostic segments (100% vs. 94%, P = .03) compared with the conventional sequence. There were no significant differences between the sequences in terms of image quality (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.2, P = .08), upslope index (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.01, P = .3), or contrast ratio (3.28Abstract : Purpose: To implement and evaluate a pseudorandom undersampling scheme for combined simultaneous multislice (SMS) balanced SSFP (bSSFP) and compressed‐sensing (CS) reconstruction to enable myocardial perfusion imaging with high spatial resolution and coverage at 1.5 T. Methods: A prospective pseudorandom undersampling scheme that is compatible with SMS‐bSSFP phase‐cycling requirements and CS was developed. The SMS‐bSSFP CS with pseudorandom and linear undersampling schemes were compared in a phantom. A high‐resolution (1.4 × 1.4 mm 2 ) six‐slice SMS‐bSSFP CS perfusion sequence was compared with a conventional (1.9 × 1.9 mm 2 ) three‐slice sequence in 10 patients. Qualitative assessment of image quality, perceived SNR, and number of diagnostic segments and quantitative measurements of sharpness, upslope index, and contrast ratio were performed. Results: In phantom experiments, pseudorandom undersampling resulted in residual artifact (RMS error) reduction by a factor of 7 compared with linear undersampling. In vivo, the proposed sequence demonstrated higher perceived SNR (2.9 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, P = .04), improved sharpness (0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.32 ± 0.05, P = .01), and a higher number of diagnostic segments (100% vs. 94%, P = .03) compared with the conventional sequence. There were no significant differences between the sequences in terms of image quality (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.2, P = .08), upslope index (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.01, P = .3), or contrast ratio (3.28 ± 0.35 vs. 3.36 ± 0.43, P = .7). Conclusion: A pseudorandom k‐space undersampling compatible with SMS‐bSSFP and CS reconstruction has been developed and enables cardiac MR perfusion imaging with increased spatial resolution and myocardial coverage, increased number of diagnostic segments and perceived SNR, and no difference in image quality, upslope index, and contrast ratio. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 84:Issue 6(2020)
- Journal:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 84:Issue 6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 84, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 84
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0084-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 3103
- Page End:
- 3116
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06-12
- Subjects:
- compressed sensing -- myocardial perfusion -- simultaneous multislice
Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals
Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals
616.07548 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mrm.28345 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-3194
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5337.798000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24636.xml