Risk assessment tools for osteoporosis and fractures in 2022. Issue 3 (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carey, John J.; Chih-Hsing Wu, Paulo; Bergin, Diane
• Is Part Of: Best practice & research. Volume 36:Issue 3(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Osteoporosis -- Osteoporosis risk -- Fracture risk -- Diagnosis -- Prognosis; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; Rheumatic Diseases -- Periodicals; Reumatologie; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101775
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-6942

Abstract

Abstract: Osteoporosis is one of the frequently encountered non-communicable diseases in the world today. Several hundred million people have osteoporosis, with many more at risk. The clinical feature is a fragility fracture (FF), which results in major reductions in the quality and quantity of life, coupled with a huge financial burden. In recognition of the growing importance, the World Health Organisation established a working group 30 years ago tasked with providing a comprehensive report to understand and assess the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely endorsed technology for assessing the risk of fracture or diagnosing osteoporosis before a fracture occurs, but others are available. In clinical practice, important distinctions are essential to optimise the use of risk assessments. Traditional tools lack specificity and were designed for populations to identify groups at higher risk using a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. Much has changed, though the purpose of risk assessment tools remains the same. In 2022, many tools are available to aid the identification of those most at risk, either likely to have osteoporosis or suffer the clinical consequence. Modern technology, enhanced imaging, proteomics, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big data science will greatly advance a more personalised risk assessment into the future. Clinicians today need to understand not only which tool is most effective and efficient for use in their practice, but also which tool to use for which patient and for what purpose. A greater understanding of the process of risk assessment, deciding who should be screened, and how to assess fracture risk and prognosis in older men and women more comprehensively will greatly reduce the burden of osteoporosis for patients, society, and healthcare systems worldwide. In this paper, we review the current status of risk assessment, screening and best practice for osteoporosis, summarise areas of uncertainty, and make some suggestions for future developments, including a more personalised approach for individuals.