Effectiveness of the analytical models used in standard techniques for mechanical property characterization of 2D materials. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cao, Guoxin; An, Fei
• Is Part Of: Materials today communications. Volume 33(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: 2D materials -- Mechanical properties -- FEM -- Indentation testing -- Bulge testing; Materials science -- Periodicals; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104802
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-4928

Abstract

Abstract: Two dimensional (2D) materials are usually assumed to be continuum thin films to study their mechanical behavior. Freestanding indentation testing and pressure bulge testing are two standard techniques for characterizing the mechanical properties of thin films. Compared with the former, the latter is far less often used to characterize the elastic moduli of 2D materials, even though there is no solid evidence to show that the former is more effective than the latter. In the present work, the effectiveness of the analytical models adopted in both approaches on determining the elastic moduli of 2D materials are investigated using numerical analysis, which can be evaluated based upon the accuracy of the determined elastic moduli, and the effects of Poisson's ratio and the applied loading range are also considered. To account for the effect of the adhesive boundary condition of freestanding 2D materials in the testing, the numerical simulations of the initially unstressed samples, pre-stretched samples and slack samples are all analyzed in the present work. It is found that the bulge testing model is actually more effective than the indentation model on determining the mechanical properties of 2D materials. Graphical Abstract: ga1