Inter-rater reliability, discriminatory and predictive validity of neck movement control tests in office workers with headache and/or neck pain. (December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Inter-rater reliability, discriminatory and predictive validity of neck movement control tests in office workers with headache and/or neck pain. (December 2022)
- Main Title:
- Inter-rater reliability, discriminatory and predictive validity of neck movement control tests in office workers with headache and/or neck pain
- Authors:
- Ernst, Markus J.
Klaus, Sandro
Lüdtke, Kerstin
Gallina, Alessio
Falla, Deborah
Aegerter, Andrea M.
Barbero, Marco
Brunner, Beatrice
Cornwall, Jon
Da Cruz Pereira, Yara
Deforth, Manja E.
Distler, Oliver
Dratva, Julia
Dressel, Holger
Egli, Tobias
Elfering, Achim
Ernst, Markus J.
Etzer-Hofer, Irene
Falla, Deborah
Gisler, Michelle
Haas, Michelle
Johnston, Venerina
Klaus, Sandro
Kobelt, Gina M.
Lüdtke, Kerstin
Luomajoki, Hannu
Melloh, Markus
Nicoletti, Corinne
Niggli, Seraina
Nüssle, Achim
Richard, Salome
Sax, Nadine
Schülke, Katja
Sjøgaard, Gisela
Staub, Lukas
Volken, Thomas
Zweig, Thomas
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Movement control tests (MCTs) are clinical tests to evaluate impairment of movement and associated neuromuscular control and are commonly used to evaluate people with neck pain or headache conditions. The aim of this study was to establish inter-rater reliability as well as discriminatory and predictive validity for seven MCTs of the upper (UCS) and lower cervical spine (LCS) in office workers with headache or neck pain. Methods: Seven MCTs of the UCS (3) and LCS (4) were performed at baseline on 140 office workers which were included in a cluster randomized controlled trial. The occurrences of headache and neck pain were established at baseline (discriminatory validity) and at a 15-month follow-up (predictive validity). Inter-rater-reliability was established in a separate cross-sectional study. Results: MCTs showed slight to almost perfect inter-rater reliability but limited discriminatory (baseline) and limited to small predictive validity (15-month follow up) for different subgroups of office workers with headache and/or neck pain. MCTs of the UCS showed limited discriminatory validity, especially for rotation in participants with headache and neck pain compared to those with headache only (Negative Likelihood-ratio: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98). Participants with neck pain only and ≥1/4 positive MCTs for the sagittal plane had an increased risk for future neck pain (Relative risk: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.05-10.56). Discussion: MCTs of the UCS and LCS areAbstract: Background: Movement control tests (MCTs) are clinical tests to evaluate impairment of movement and associated neuromuscular control and are commonly used to evaluate people with neck pain or headache conditions. The aim of this study was to establish inter-rater reliability as well as discriminatory and predictive validity for seven MCTs of the upper (UCS) and lower cervical spine (LCS) in office workers with headache or neck pain. Methods: Seven MCTs of the UCS (3) and LCS (4) were performed at baseline on 140 office workers which were included in a cluster randomized controlled trial. The occurrences of headache and neck pain were established at baseline (discriminatory validity) and at a 15-month follow-up (predictive validity). Inter-rater-reliability was established in a separate cross-sectional study. Results: MCTs showed slight to almost perfect inter-rater reliability but limited discriminatory (baseline) and limited to small predictive validity (15-month follow up) for different subgroups of office workers with headache and/or neck pain. MCTs of the UCS showed limited discriminatory validity, especially for rotation in participants with headache and neck pain compared to those with headache only (Negative Likelihood-ratio: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98). Participants with neck pain only and ≥1/4 positive MCTs for the sagittal plane had an increased risk for future neck pain (Relative risk: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.05-10.56). Discussion: MCTs of the UCS and LCS are reliable but have only limited to small validity to predict future headache events in office workers. Insufficient sagittal plane movement control may predict neck pain relapses in the future. Highlights: Movement control of the cervical spine can be tested reliably. Limited validity to distinguish headache or neck pain from asymptomatic. 3 × higher risk of future neck pain and deficits in sagittal plane movements. 2.5 × higher risk of future headaches in headache + neck pain subjects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Musculoskeletal science and practice. Volume 62(2022)
- Journal:
- Musculoskeletal science and practice
- Issue:
- Volume 62(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 62, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0062-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12
- Subjects:
- Headache -- Neck pain -- Office work -- Movement control -- Reliability -- Validity
Manipulation (Therapeutics) -- Periodicals
Physical therapy -- Periodicals
Neuromuscular diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Manipulation (Therapeutics)
Neuromuscular diseases -- Treatment
Physical therapy
Manipulation, Orthopedic
Musculoskeletal Diseases -- therapy
Neuromuscular Diseases -- therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities
Electronic journals
Periodicals
615.82 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/browse/journal/24687812/latest ↗
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/musculoskeletal-science-and-practice ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102685 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2468-8630
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5986.535400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24631.xml