Occupational exposure to severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and risk of infection among healthcare personnel. (6th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shah, Vishal P.; Breeher, Laura E.; Alleckson, Julie M.; Rivers, David G.; Wang, Zhen; Stratton, Emily R.; Farah, Wigdan; Hainy, Caitlin M.; Swift, Melanie D.
• Is Part Of: Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 43:Number 12(2022)
• Page Start: 1785
• Page End: 1789
• Publication Date: 2022-12-06
• Subjects: Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Hospitals -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.533
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-823X

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To assess the rate and factors associated with healthcare personnel (HCP) testing positive for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after an occupational exposure. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center with sites in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Florida. Participants: HCP with a high or medium risk occupational exposure to a patient or other HCP with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We reviewed the records of HCP with significant occupational exposures from March 20, 2020, through December 31, 2020. We then performed regression analysis to assess the impact of demographic and occupational variables to assess their impact on the likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Results: In total, 2, 253 confirmed occupational exposures occurred during the study period. Employees were the source for 57.1% of exposures. Overall, 101 HCP (4.5%) tested positive in the postexposure period. Of these, 80 had employee sources of exposure and 21 had patient sources of exposure. The postexposure infection rate was 6.2% when employees were the source, compared to 2.2% with patient sources. In a multivariate analysis, occupational exposure from an employee source had a higher risk of testing positive compared to a patient source (odds ratio [OR], 3.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72–6.04). Sex, age, high-risk exposure, and HCP role were not associated with an increased risk of testing positive. Conclusions: The risk of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) following a significant occupational exposure has remained relatively low, even in the prevaccination era. Exposure to an infectious coworker carries a higher risk than exposure to a patient. Continued vigilance and precautions remain necessary in healthcare settings.