Selective neural coding of object, feature, and geometry spatial cues in humans. Issue 17 (1st July 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Selective neural coding of object, feature, and geometry spatial cues in humans. Issue 17 (1st July 2022)
- Main Title:
- Selective neural coding of object, feature, and geometry spatial cues in humans
- Authors:
- Ramanoël, Stephen
Durteste, Marion
Bizeul, Alice
Ozier‐Lafontaine, Anthony
Bécu, Marcia
Sahel, José‐Alain
Habas, Christophe
Arleo, Angelo - Abstract:
- Abstract: Orienting in space requires the processing of visual spatial cues. The dominant hypothesis about the brain structures mediating the coding of spatial cues stipulates the existence of a hippocampal‐dependent system for the representation of geometry and a striatal‐dependent system for the representation of landmarks. However, this dual‐system hypothesis is based on paradigms that presented spatial cues conveying either conflicting or ambiguous spatial information and that used the term landmark to refer to both discrete three‐dimensional objects and wall features. Here, we test the hypothesis of complex activation patterns in the hippocampus and the striatum during visual coding. We also postulate that object‐based and feature‐based navigation are not equivalent instances of landmark‐based navigation. We examined how the neural networks associated with geometry‐, object‐, and feature‐based spatial navigation compared with a control condition in a two‐choice behavioral paradigm using fMRI. We showed that the hippocampus was involved in all three types of cue‐based navigation, whereas the striatum was more strongly recruited in the presence of geometric cues than object or feature cues. We also found that unique, specific neural signatures were associated with each spatial cue. Object‐based navigation elicited a widespread pattern of activity in temporal and occipital regions relative to feature‐based navigation. These findings extend the current view of a dual,Abstract: Orienting in space requires the processing of visual spatial cues. The dominant hypothesis about the brain structures mediating the coding of spatial cues stipulates the existence of a hippocampal‐dependent system for the representation of geometry and a striatal‐dependent system for the representation of landmarks. However, this dual‐system hypothesis is based on paradigms that presented spatial cues conveying either conflicting or ambiguous spatial information and that used the term landmark to refer to both discrete three‐dimensional objects and wall features. Here, we test the hypothesis of complex activation patterns in the hippocampus and the striatum during visual coding. We also postulate that object‐based and feature‐based navigation are not equivalent instances of landmark‐based navigation. We examined how the neural networks associated with geometry‐, object‐, and feature‐based spatial navigation compared with a control condition in a two‐choice behavioral paradigm using fMRI. We showed that the hippocampus was involved in all three types of cue‐based navigation, whereas the striatum was more strongly recruited in the presence of geometric cues than object or feature cues. We also found that unique, specific neural signatures were associated with each spatial cue. Object‐based navigation elicited a widespread pattern of activity in temporal and occipital regions relative to feature‐based navigation. These findings extend the current view of a dual, juxtaposed hippocampal–striatal system for visual spatial coding in humans. They also provide novel insights into the neural networks mediating object versus feature spatial coding, suggesting a need to distinguish these two types of landmarks in the context of human navigation. Abstract : Our article provides novel insights into the neural networks mediating spatial cue processing during navigation including: Complex hippocampal–striatal involvement during visual spatial coding for flexible human navigation behavior. Distinct neural signatures associated with object‐, feature‐, and geometry‐based navigation. Object‐ and feature‐based navigation are not equivalent instances of landmark‐based navigation. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Human brain mapping. Volume 43:Issue 17(2022)
- Journal:
- Human brain mapping
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Issue 17(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 17 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 17
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0043-0017-0000
- Page Start:
- 5281
- Page End:
- 5295
- Publication Date:
- 2022-07-01
- Subjects:
- functional MRI -- geometry -- hippocampus -- landmark -- navigation -- spatial cues -- striatum
Brain mapping -- Periodicals
611.81 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/hbm.26002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1065-9471
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4336.031000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24624.xml