Monitoring genetic diversity with new indicators applied to an alpine freshwater top predator. Issue 24 (13th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andersson, Anastasia; Karlsson, Sten; Ryman, Nils; Laikre, Linda
• Is Part Of: Molecular ecology. Volume 31:Issue 24(2022)
• Page Start: 6422
• Page End: 6439
• Publication Date: 2022-10-13
• Subjects: cryptic sympatry -- hidden biodiversity -- intraspecific biodiversity -- protected area -- sympatric populations; Molecular ecology -- Periodicals; Molecular population biology -- Periodicals; 576
• DOI: 10.1111/mec.16710
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-1083

Abstract

Abstract: Genetic diversity is the basis for population adaptation and long‐term survival, yet rarely considered in biodiversity monitoring. One key issue is the need for useful and straightforward indicators of genetic diversity. We monitored genetic diversity over 40 years (1970–2010) in metapopulations of brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) inhabiting 27 small mountain lakes representing 10 lake systems in central Sweden using >1200 fish per time point. We tested six newly proposed indicators; three were designed for broad, international use in the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and are currently applied in several countries. The other three were recently elaborated for national use by a Swedish science‐management effort and applied for the first time here. The Swedish indicators use molecular genetic data to monitor genetic diversity within and between populations (indicators Δ H and Δ F ST, respectively) and assess the effective population size ( N e ‐indicator). We identified 29 genetically distinct populations, all retained over time. Twelve of the 27 lakes harboured more than one population indicating that brown trout biodiversity hidden as cryptic, sympatric populations are more common than recognized. The N e indicator showed values below the threshold ( N e ≤ 500) in 20 populations with five showing N e < 100. Statistically significant genetic diversity reductions occurred in several populations. Metapopulation structure appears to buffer against diversity loss; applying the indicators to metapopulations suggest mostly acceptable rates of change in all but one system. The CBD indicators agreed with the Swedish ones but provided less detail. All these indicators are appropriate for managers to initiate monitoring of genetic biodiversity.