Follow-up of patients with uncontrolled asthma: clinical features of asthma patients according to the level of control achieved (the COAS study). Issue 3 (2nd March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Follow-up of patients with uncontrolled asthma: clinical features of asthma patients according to the level of control achieved (the COAS study). Issue 3 (2nd March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Follow-up of patients with uncontrolled asthma: clinical features of asthma patients according to the level of control achieved (the COAS study)
- Authors:
- Munoz-Cano, Rosa
Torrego, Alfons
Bartra, Joan
Sanchez-Lopez, Jaime
Palomino, Rosa
Picado, Cesar
Valero, Antonio - Abstract:
- Our aim was to study the asthma control achieved in patients with uncontrolled asthma who had received appropriate treatment according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2010 (valid at the time the study was designed), and to analyse the factors associated with a lack of asthma control. This was a multicentre study in routine clinical practice performed in patients with uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2010. At visit 1, we recorded demographics, asthma characteristics and spirometry. We assessed asthma control using GINA 2010 criteria and the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Treatment was optimised according to GINA 2010. At visit 2, 3 months later, we reassessed spirometry, asthma control and factors associated with failure to achieve control. We recruited 1299 patients with uncontrolled asthma (mean age 46.5±17.3 years, 60.7% women, 25.8% obese). The mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 76.4±12.8% and the mean post-bronchodilator increase was 14.9±6.8%. We observed poor agreement between ACT and GINA 2010 when evaluating asthma control (kappa = −0.151). At visit 2, asthma in 71.2% of patients was still not fully controlled. Patients whose asthma remained uncontrolled were older, had a higher body mass index, greater disease severity, longer disease evolution and worse lung function. After treatment optimisation, most patients did not achieve optimal control according to GINA 2010. Risk factors for failure to achieve asthma control wereOur aim was to study the asthma control achieved in patients with uncontrolled asthma who had received appropriate treatment according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2010 (valid at the time the study was designed), and to analyse the factors associated with a lack of asthma control. This was a multicentre study in routine clinical practice performed in patients with uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2010. At visit 1, we recorded demographics, asthma characteristics and spirometry. We assessed asthma control using GINA 2010 criteria and the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Treatment was optimised according to GINA 2010. At visit 2, 3 months later, we reassessed spirometry, asthma control and factors associated with failure to achieve control. We recruited 1299 patients with uncontrolled asthma (mean age 46.5±17.3 years, 60.7% women, 25.8% obese). The mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 76.4±12.8% and the mean post-bronchodilator increase was 14.9±6.8%. We observed poor agreement between ACT and GINA 2010 when evaluating asthma control (kappa = −0.151). At visit 2, asthma in 71.2% of patients was still not fully controlled. Patients whose asthma remained uncontrolled were older, had a higher body mass index, greater disease severity, longer disease evolution and worse lung function. After treatment optimisation, most patients did not achieve optimal control according to GINA 2010. Risk factors for failure to achieve asthma control were time of disease evolution, severity, age, weight and lung function impairment (excluded in the GINA 2014). Asthma in most patients is not fully controlled despite adjusting their treatment using GINA 2010 strategy criteria http://ow.ly/C73c307fMOZ … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European respiratory journal. Volume 49:Issue 3(2017)
- Journal:
- European respiratory journal
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0049-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03-02
- Subjects:
- Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiration -- Periodicals
616.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://erj.ersjournals.com ↗
http://www.ersnet.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=mrj ↗
http://www.ingenta.com/journals/browse/ers/erj?mode=direct ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1183/13993003.01885-2015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0903-1936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24621.xml