Exploring the potential health and ecological damage of lead–zinc production activities in China: A life cycle assessment perspective. (25th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jia, Yuke; Zhang, Tianzuo; Zhai, Yijie; Bai, Yueyang; Ren, Ke; Shen, Xiaoxu; Cheng, Ziyue; Zhou, Xinying; Hong, Jinglan
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 381:Part 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-12-25
• Subjects: Life cycle assessment -- Social economic impact -- Direct emissions -- Carcinogenic impact -- Lead–zinc production activities; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135218
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: Lead and zinc are indispensable nonferrous metals in the current industrialized society because of their position as raw materials for various industrial products. However, the massive environmental burden imposed by the activities of the lead–zinc industry will trigger potential social impacts. This study systematically evaluated the environmental and social economic burden of lead–zinc production activities at the national level during the entire industrial chain via life cycle assessment coupled with economic assessment method. China, the world's largest lead and zinc metal producer, was used as an example. Results demonstrated that in 2018, the national values of the potential threats to human health, ecosystem quality, and social economy were 3.55 × 10 5 DALY, 1.27 × 10 4 species. yr, and 3.90 × 10 10 $, respectively. The potential social economic impact of China's lead–zinc production increased by 49% from 2008 to 2018. Direct emission was the primary contributor in most environmental impact categories (i.e., freshwater ecotoxicity, particulates formation, non-carcinogens, and carcinogens), except for global warming, in which electricity generation was the main contributor. Heavy metals emitted during the mining and dressing stage provided the predominant contribution to ecosystem quality degradation. Copper discharged into water was identified as a key substance that accounted for 59% of the overall potential threats. Henan, Hunan, and Yunnan provinces were the dominant provinces contributing to the overall social economic impacts of lead–zinc smelting. Additionally, association analysis indicated a significant correlation between the lead–zinc smelting activities and multiple cancers (e.g., stomach, brain, liver, and colon cancers). Adopting environmentally-friendly and cost-effectiveness wastewater treatment technology (e.g., adsorption) or water reuse is recommended to reduce heavy metal emissions. The development of renewable electricity and implementing cross-regional electricity transmission options have important benefits for reducing the environmental and social economic burden of the lead–zinc production activities. The application of long-term marginal power would alleviate the environmental burden in global warming category by 32.1%. The dust removal technologies of selective catalytic reduction, electrostatic precipitator, and wet flue gas desulfurization are implemented in combination to remove carcinogenic heavy metals from the air to reduce health risks and socio-economic losses. Highlights: Environmental damage and economic loss of lead–zinc production activity are explored. Direct emissions from mining and dressing occupy 65% of total socio-economic loss. Copper in mining and dressing wastewater should be preferentially controlled. Electricity structure optimization and cross-regional transmission are advocated. The significant carcinogenicity of heavy metals from lead-zinc smelting is revealed.