Administrative Data Use in National Registry Efforts: Blessing or Curse?. (19th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bedard, Nicholas A.; Katz, Jeffrey N.; Losina, Elena; Opare-Addo, Maame B.; Kopp, Paul T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of bone and joint surgery. Volume 104(2022)Supplement 3
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 46
• Publication Date: 2022-10-19
• Subjects: Bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Joints -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedics; General Surgery; Bone Diseases; Joint Diseases; Bones -- Surgery; Joints -- Surgery; Orthopedics; Bot (anatomie); Gewrichten; Chirurgie (geneeskunde); Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.47005
• DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00565
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9355

Abstract

Abstract: "Big data" refers to a growing field of large database research. Administrative data, a subset of big data, includes information from insurance claims, electronic medical records, and registries that can be useful for investigating novel research questions. While its use provides salient advantages, potential researchers relying on big data would benefit from knowing about how these databases are coded, common errors they may encounter, and how to best use large data to address various research questions. In the first section of this paper, Dr. Nicholas A. Bedard addresses the four major pitfalls to avoid with diagnosis and procedure codes in administrative data. In the next section, Dr. Jeffrey N. Katz et al. focus on the strengths and limitations of administrative data, suggesting methods to mitigate these limitations. Lastly, Dr. Elena Losina et al. review the uses and misuses of large databases for cost-effectiveness research, detailing methods for careful economic evaluations.