A Comparison of Two Case-Crossover Methods for Studying the Dose-Response Relationship between Alcohol and Injury. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bond, Jason; Cherpitel, Cheryl J.; Ye, Yu; Borges, Guilherme; Chou, S. Patricia; Chun, Sungsoo; Sovinova, Hana; Gmel, Gerhard
• Is Part Of: Contemporary drug problems. Volume 41:Number 1(2014)
• Page Start: 91
• Page End: 108
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: Relative risk -- case-crossover -- dose-response -- control period definition; Drug abuse -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; 362.2905
• DOI: 10.1177/009145091404100105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0091-4509

Abstract

This study compares dose-response injury risk estimates for two control periods defined as the same 6-hour period the week prior and the set of all non-sleeping 6-hour periods over the past year. Dose-response injury risk estimates for the multiple match controls are generated via the application of a maximum-likelihood approach. Injury risk associated with any (i.e., 1 drink or more) drinking 6 hours prior to injury was similar for the two control choices (last week and usual frequency). For 1–4 drinks, risk estimates were similar across control period definitions; for 5+ drinks, risk using the week prior as the control was nearly double that using the past 12 months as the control. Although studies with smaller n-sizes may benefit from the increase in precision from the use of the multiple control periods, results indicate that heavy drinking injury risk estimates should be used with caution.