Adaptation of remote symptom monitoring using electronic patient-reported outcomes for implementation in real-world settings. Issue 28 (1st October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dent, D'Ambra; Ingram, Stacey A.; Caston, Nicole E.; Thigpen, Haley; Lalor, Fallon; Jamy, Omer; Giri, Smith; Azuero, Andres; Young Pierce, Jennifer; McGowen, Chelsea L.; Daniel, Casey L.; Andrews, Courtney J.; Huang, Chao-Hui; Dionne-Odom, James Nicholas; Weiner, Bryan J; Howell, Doris; Jackson, Bradford E.; Stover, Angela M.; Rocque, Gabrielle Betty
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical oncology. Volume 40:Issue 28(2022)Supplement
• Page Start: 272
• Page End: 272
• Publication Date: 2022-10-01
• Subjects: 130-513-11338 -- 130-3367 -- 329-475-9963 -- 613-302-309; 6 -- 3 -- 2 -- 2; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Periodicals; Oncology; Medical Oncology; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Périodiques; Cancérologie; Cancer; Oncology; Oncologia; Càncer; Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.272
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0732-183X

Abstract

Abstract : 272 Background: Despite evidence of clinical benefits, widespread implementation of remote symptom monitoring has been limited. We describe a process of adapting a remote symptom monitoring intervention developed in a research setting to a real-world clinical setting at two cancer centers. Methods: This formative evaluation assessed core components and adaptations to improve acceptability and fit of remote symptom monitoring using Stirman's Framework for Modifications and Adaptations. Implementation outcomes were evaluated in pilot studies at the two cancer centers testing technology (Phase I) and workflow (Phase II and III) using electronic health data; qualitative evaluation with semi-structured interviews of clinical team members; and capture of field notes from clinical teams and administrators regarding barriers and recommended adaptations for future implementation. Results: Core components of remote symptom monitoring included electronic delivery of surveys with actionable symptoms, patient education on the intervention, a system to monitor survey compliance in real-time, the capacity to generate alerts, training nurses to manage alerts, and identification of personnel responsible for managing symptoms. In the pilot studies, while most patients completed > 50% of expected surveys, adaptations were identified to address barriers related to workflow challenges, patient and clinician access to technology, digital health literacy, survey fatigue, alert fatigue, and data visibility. Conclusions: Using an implementation science approach, we facilitated adaptation of remote symptom monitoring interventions from the research setting to clinical practice and identified key areas to promote effective uptake and sustainability.