Outcome of Impella 2.5 use in patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Henan, China: a case series. (January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhat, Rafiq Ahmed; Ali, Syed Manzoor; Rathi, Akanksha; Bhat, Javaid Akhter; Iqbal, Raja Saqib; Islam, Md Monowarul; Maqbool, Syed; Tibrewal, Abhishek; Qu, Yongsheng; Zhang, You; Sun, Yuxiao; Xiao, Wentao; Gao, Chuanyu
• Is Part Of: Perfusion. Volume 38:Number 1(2023)
• Page Start: 208
• Page End: 213
• Publication Date: 2023-01
• Subjects: case series -- acute myocardial infarction -- heart failure -- left ventricular assist device -- Impella; Perfusion (Physiology) -- Periodicals; Blood -- Circulation, Artificial -- Periodicals; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Extracorporeal Circulation -- Periodicals; Perfusion -- Periodicals; Circulation extracorporelle -- Périodiques; Perfusion -- Périodiques; 617.41
• DOI: 10.1177/02676591211049018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0267-6591

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) or heart failure is associated with an unacceptably high in-hospital mortality of 33%–55% and a lost chance to accept PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Aim: The aim of the study was to find out whether percutaneous hemodynamic support device Impella 2.5 improves prognosis of high-risk PCI patients or not. Methods: This study was a case series involving six patients who underwent a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD, Impella 2.5, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) implantation after suffering from AMI with a very low ejection fraction and acute heart failure. The clinical experience and outcomes of the patients are hereby discussed. Results: All PCI procedures were safely completed under LVAD support. The hemodynamic parameters of all patients improved clinically over the next 30 days and following 12 months after Impella insertion except in two patients, of which one patient (Case number 6) died 4 days post-Impella protected PCI procedure due to acute left ventricle heart failure with cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema; and another one died at 12 months after Impella protected PCI procedure (Case number 4) due to decompensated heart failure and infected pneumonia. Conclusion: Percutaneous hemodynamic support is favorable and feasible during high risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). A bigger study is needed to substantiate the claims of the current study.