Application Settings versus Fixed Photomultiplier Tube Voltages for Optimal Cytometer Stability over Time, and Effect on Reusing a Compensation Matrix. Issue 9 (21st April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Andersen, Morten Nørgaard; Skovbo, Anni; Petersen, Charlotte Christie; Hokland, Marianne
• Is Part Of: Cytometry. Volume 97:Issue 9(2020)
• Page Start: 965
• Page End: 974
• Publication Date: 2020-04-21
• Subjects: flow cytometry -- calibration -- standardization -- application settings -- compensation; Flow cytometry -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in biology -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 571.605
• DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-4922

Abstract

Abstract : In flow cytometry, a compensation matrix is commonly reused over time, especially in clinical laboratories, to save time and reagents. However, generating a same‐day compensation matrix is considered the best practice by many experts. BD Biosciences developed Cytometer Setup and Tracking software to deliver proper instrument characterization, performance tracking, and stability. BD's "Application Settings" enable daily cytometer adjustments of photomultiplier tube (PMT) settings to correct for day‐to‐day variations in instrument performance. Here, we investigated if using Application Settings would improve data stability over time, including the impact on data stability when reusing a compensation matrix. We consecutively analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) aliquots from a single healthy donor together with 8‐peak Rainbow beads and daily compensation controls (22 runs in total over 6.5 months). We found larger variation within both PBMC subset quantifications and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels when using Application Settings (i.e., daily adjusted PMTs) compared to fixed PMT voltages (both with the same Day 0 compensation matrix applied). This larger variation was partly due to errors in compensation, but was also seen for Rainbow beads MFI data (not impacted by compensation), and thus likely produced by imprecise adjustments of PMTs by Applications Settings. Notably, the larger variation observed with Application Settings was most pronounced on a few days of the experiment with very large deviations, whereas on most days Application Settings and Fixed PMTs performed similar. The present results call for caution in using Application Settings in longitudinal studies, especially if also reusing a compensation matrix. In contrast, reusing a compensation matrix over time with fixed PMT voltages yielded stable results comparable with running same‐day compensation controls. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry Abstract : Application Settings vs. fixed PMT voltages for optimal cytometer stability over time, and effect on re‐using a compensation matrix. Aliquots of PBMCs, along with Rainbow beads, were analysed consecutively during >6 1/2 months to compare the stability of results obtained with Cytometer vs. Application Settings. Compared to the "Gold Standard" (fixed PMTs with "fresh" same day compensation controls), we found larger variation within both PBMC subset quantifications and MFI levels when using Application Settings (i.e. daily adjusted PMTs) compared to fixed PMT voltages (both with re‐use of the same the "Day 0" compensation matrix).