Secondary metabolites from nectar and pollen: a resource for ecological and evolutionary studies. Issue 4 (8th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Palmer‐Young, Evan C.; Farrell, Iain W.; Adler, Lynn S.; Milano, Nelson J.; Egan, Paul A.; Irwin, Rebecca E.; Stevenson, Philip C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 100:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-03-08
• Subjects: allelopathy -- cultivar variation -- diversity -- floral chemistry -- floral rewards -- intraspecific variation -- liquid‐chromatography–mass‐spectrometry -- mutualisms -- plant secondary metabolites -- plant–microbe interactions -- plant–pollinator interactions -- site variation; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2621
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Floral chemistry mediates plant interactions with herbivores, pathogens, and pollinators. The chemistry of floral nectar and pollen, the primary food rewards for pollinators, can affect both plant reproduction and pollinator health. Although the existence and functional significance of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites has long been known, comprehensive quantitative characterizations of secondary chemistry exist for only a few species. Moreover, little is known about intraspecific variation in nectar and pollen chemical profiles. Because the ecological effects of secondary chemicals are dose‐dependent, heterogeneity across genotypes and populations could influence floral trait evolution and pollinator foraging ecology. To better understand within‐ and across‐species heterogeneity in nectar and pollen secondary chemistry, we undertook exhaustive LC‐MS and LC‐UV‐based chemical characterizations of nectar and pollen methanol extracts from 31 cultivated and wild plant species. Nectar and pollen were collected from farms and natural areas in Massachusetts, Vermont, and California, USA, in 2013 and 2014. For wild species, we aimed to collect 10 samples from each of three sites. For agricultural and horticultural species, we aimed for 10 samples from each of three cultivars. Our data set (1, 535 samples, 102 identified compounds) identifies and quantifies each compound recorded in methanolic extracts, and includes chemical metadata that describe the molecular mass, retention time, and chemical classification of each compound. A reference phylogeny is included for comparative analyses. We found that each species possessed a distinct chemical profile; moreover, within species, few compounds were found in both nectar and pollen. The most common secondary chemical classes were flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids and amines, and chlorogenic acids. The most common compounds were quercetin and kaempferol glycosides. Pollens contained high concentrations of hydroxycinnamoyl‐spermidine conjugates, mainly triscoumaroyl and trisferuloyl spermidine, found in 71% of species. When present, pollen alkaloids and spermidines had median nonzero concentrations of 23, 000 μmol/L (median 52% of recorded micromolar composition). Although secondary chemistry was qualitatively consistent within each species and sample type, we found significant quantitative heterogeneity across cultivars and sites. These data provide a standard reference for future ecological and evolutionary research on nectar and pollen secondary chemistry, including its role in pollinator health and plant reproduction. Data are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0 US) and may be freely used if properly cited.